- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. RL0919 ( talk) 01:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Brady Michael Wright
over-personal promotional bio with apparent blp problems. nochancve of any conceivable notability DGG ( talk ) 11:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - It's a draft. It hasn't shown a sign of being hopeless, just unlikely. Leave it in draft. Robert McClenon ( talk) 12:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep we can remove the BLP-noncompliant material. I do agree that the article has practically zero chance at achieving notability, but maybe there's some offline sources about this person that we just don't know about. I say let it be deleted in six months if there's no activity. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 14:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep BLP issues can be easily dealt with by editing. Notability seems unlikely, but this is in draft, and it is just possibler that ther is something out htere not yet in the draft. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. RL0919 ( talk) 01:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Brady Michael Wright
over-personal promotional bio with apparent blp problems. nochancve of any conceivable notability DGG ( talk ) 11:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - It's a draft. It hasn't shown a sign of being hopeless, just unlikely. Leave it in draft. Robert McClenon ( talk) 12:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep we can remove the BLP-noncompliant material. I do agree that the article has practically zero chance at achieving notability, but maybe there's some offline sources about this person that we just don't know about. I say let it be deleted in six months if there's no activity. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 14:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep BLP issues can be easily dealt with by editing. Notability seems unlikely, but this is in draft, and it is just possibler that ther is something out htere not yet in the draft. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.