From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Opinions differ on whether or not to retarget or keep for possible expanding right now, but consensus is to not delete at this time. ♠ PMC(talk) 21:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Draft:Backup guitar

Draft:Backup guitar ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No legitimate content. Gooner2004 ( talk) 01:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete created today but I can't see how this can be more than a bad definition. A guitar is a guitar regardless of how it is used. Maybe a test edit? Legacypac ( talk) 01:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep – it's a legitimate topic. We have an article on backup vocals, so why not guitar? Or maybe it could be a redirect to rhythm guitar, which is the counterpart to lead guitar. The possibilities are endless. Bradv 🍁 02:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep - Doesn't need deleting at this time. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep – In part per Bradv, and also because the user just began editing today (6 April 2019), so the nomination goes against the grain of WP:BITE. Perhaps allow the user time to expand the draft, and if they don't, it can then be deleted via WP:G13. North America 1000 10:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep Open to alternatives such as redirecting/merging or even expanding with sourced content that shows that this is a notable topic. Otherwise this is nothing but a neologisim. Hasteur ( talk) 13:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak retarget to Rhythm guitar. If the intent is to mention backup instruments in case the primary one breaks, then it doesn't need its own article, like backup tennis racquet. But if it's to assign roles in bands for guitar players then rhythm is the closest to that. Otherwise, add Backup band to the list. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 13:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . Opinions differ on whether or not to retarget or keep for possible expanding right now, but consensus is to not delete at this time. ♠ PMC(talk) 21:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Draft:Backup guitar

Draft:Backup guitar ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No legitimate content. Gooner2004 ( talk) 01:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete created today but I can't see how this can be more than a bad definition. A guitar is a guitar regardless of how it is used. Maybe a test edit? Legacypac ( talk) 01:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep – it's a legitimate topic. We have an article on backup vocals, so why not guitar? Or maybe it could be a redirect to rhythm guitar, which is the counterpart to lead guitar. The possibilities are endless. Bradv 🍁 02:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep - Doesn't need deleting at this time. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep – In part per Bradv, and also because the user just began editing today (6 April 2019), so the nomination goes against the grain of WP:BITE. Perhaps allow the user time to expand the draft, and if they don't, it can then be deleted via WP:G13. North America 1000 10:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep Open to alternatives such as redirecting/merging or even expanding with sourced content that shows that this is a notable topic. Otherwise this is nothing but a neologisim. Hasteur ( talk) 13:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak retarget to Rhythm guitar. If the intent is to mention backup instruments in case the primary one breaks, then it doesn't need its own article, like backup tennis racquet. But if it's to assign roles in bands for guitar players then rhythm is the closest to that. Otherwise, add Backup band to the list. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 13:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook