 | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 July 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
This article has come back to AfC 7 times without substantially changing. It looks like the creator cannot figure out WP style or policies. In the last entry the creator deleted one sentence and re-submitted. At this point, this is just a waste of time for AfC reviewers, and we need to get it off our plate. LaMona ( talk) 16:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - simply a waste of time to keep churning this through AfC with little to no improvement. Onel5969 TT me 19:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 July 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Ricky81682 ( talk) 05:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
This article has come back to AfC 7 times without substantially changing. It looks like the creator cannot figure out WP style or policies. In the last entry the creator deleted one sentence and re-submitted. At this point, this is just a waste of time for AfC reviewers, and we need to get it off our plate. LaMona ( talk) 16:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - simply a waste of time to keep churning this through AfC with little to no improvement. Onel5969 TT me 19:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.