- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. MER-C 19:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Autumn Kent
The subject of the article doesn't seem to be notable enough to be in mainspace (being a decent researcher isn't sufficient notability.) -- Taku ( talk) 23:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The argument for notability here would not be through WP:PROF#C1 (high-impact research), but #C4 and #C7 — influence within and without academia, in this case through LGBT activism. I honestly think the case is currently borderline, but I don't see the harm in keeping a draft around, particularly since more sources might well arise within the next six months. If we don't want it in the Draft namespace, I'd be happy to keep it around as a user sub-page. (Courtesy ping of @ David Eppstein who has contributed to the page.) XOR'easter ( talk) 21:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as a draft. I think the case for notability in article space is borderline, so my opinion might be different if this were an article, but that's what drafts are for, in part: to keep borderline content in development as sources are found to make notability clearer. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 22:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. MER-C 19:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Autumn Kent
The subject of the article doesn't seem to be notable enough to be in mainspace (being a decent researcher isn't sufficient notability.) -- Taku ( talk) 23:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The argument for notability here would not be through WP:PROF#C1 (high-impact research), but #C4 and #C7 — influence within and without academia, in this case through LGBT activism. I honestly think the case is currently borderline, but I don't see the harm in keeping a draft around, particularly since more sources might well arise within the next six months. If we don't want it in the Draft namespace, I'd be happy to keep it around as a user sub-page. (Courtesy ping of @ David Eppstein who has contributed to the page.) XOR'easter ( talk) 21:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as a draft. I think the case for notability in article space is borderline, so my opinion might be different if this were an article, but that's what drafts are for, in part: to keep borderline content in development as sources are found to make notability clearer. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 22:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.