The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: redirect to
Evolutionism. Without deletion, and a note to be placed at
Talk:Evolutionism to advise that sources are available in the draft history. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
This draft is elegable for G13 but has been tagged as promising. It has not be put to AfC.
Legacypac (
talk) 01:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Someone may improve it. The concept is notable.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 01:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Notable, as shown by what reliable sources?
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Johnuniq: which of the existing sources in the draft did you find unreliable?
VQuakr (
talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Robert McClenon: seems like it duplicates an existing topic,
Evolutionism. Different connotations maybe, but the same topic as far as I can tell.
VQuakr (
talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep but not as a standalone article. It seems like this could be usefully merged into
Evolutionism or similar.
ReykYO! 08:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
All belief in macro evolution is by nature atheistic just as all belief in creation is religious. If someone wants to merge this crappy draft go for it but I can't see how the material will really improve
evolution.
Legacypac (
talk) 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The list of sources seems potentially useful, so redirect to
Evolutionism and make a note of the sources' existence on the target's talk page.
VQuakr (
talk) 18:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: redirect to
Evolutionism. Without deletion, and a note to be placed at
Talk:Evolutionism to advise that sources are available in the draft history. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
This draft is elegable for G13 but has been tagged as promising. It has not be put to AfC.
Legacypac (
talk) 01:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Someone may improve it. The concept is notable.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 01:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Notable, as shown by what reliable sources?
Johnuniq (
talk) 03:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Johnuniq: which of the existing sources in the draft did you find unreliable?
VQuakr (
talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Robert McClenon: seems like it duplicates an existing topic,
Evolutionism. Different connotations maybe, but the same topic as far as I can tell.
VQuakr (
talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep but not as a standalone article. It seems like this could be usefully merged into
Evolutionism or similar.
ReykYO! 08:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
All belief in macro evolution is by nature atheistic just as all belief in creation is religious. If someone wants to merge this crappy draft go for it but I can't see how the material will really improve
evolution.
Legacypac (
talk) 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The list of sources seems potentially useful, so redirect to
Evolutionism and make a note of the sources' existence on the target's talk page.
VQuakr (
talk) 18:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.