- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft:9Dragons
So here is the story. I moved 9Dragons to Draft:9Dragons to work on it a bit, considering the article's state was pretty....bad. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:9Dragons&oldid=871332961 And now I reworked things a bit, cleaned it up and added only sources I was able to find, but....I discovered the ones I used except the IGN one (and even this one is debatable about how much it covers the game at all), PR things like PRWb reference and the WP:ROUTINE Engadget one it was picked up by someone, may be unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#Unreliable_sources, like MMOHut, MMOSite, mmos.com, MMORPG, ONRPG etc. Since I pretty much do not see what else can I add in my searches, I think this should be deleted on grounds of lack of notability, gave up trying to salvage this. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete it was in mainspace so mainspace critera apply. You gave it a good try so I'll go with your assessment. Legacypac ( talk) 12:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - If a neutral editor tried to make it into a reasonable article and failed honorably, we can send this to nirvana honorably. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft:9Dragons
So here is the story. I moved 9Dragons to Draft:9Dragons to work on it a bit, considering the article's state was pretty....bad. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:9Dragons&oldid=871332961 And now I reworked things a bit, cleaned it up and added only sources I was able to find, but....I discovered the ones I used except the IGN one (and even this one is debatable about how much it covers the game at all), PR things like PRWb reference and the WP:ROUTINE Engadget one it was picked up by someone, may be unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#Unreliable_sources, like MMOHut, MMOSite, mmos.com, MMORPG, ONRPG etc. Since I pretty much do not see what else can I add in my searches, I think this should be deleted on grounds of lack of notability, gave up trying to salvage this. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete it was in mainspace so mainspace critera apply. You gave it a good try so I'll go with your assessment. Legacypac ( talk) 12:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - If a neutral editor tried to make it into a reasonable article and failed honorably, we can send this to nirvana honorably. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.