The result of the discussion was: keep . No consensus to delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable company written by COI editor. Article reads like an advertisement. There's a long list of references, but none of them meet the requirements of WP:NCORP --
RoySmith
(talk)
03:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, I was aware that there was quite a significant conflict of interest. Reading all this now, I think I'm out of my depth...
My aim was to create a basis from which others could contribute and add, but as you've mentioned, my experience is limited. I raised this conflict of interest with a view of openness - if I hadn't raised this conflict, would it had been regarded as biased? I tried to write neutral, and I used citations (although appreciate now that they're not great)
I do, however, think the page is notable. There are quite a few mentions of the company, which currently do not link to a 451 Research page: Industry analyst Yankee Group Uptime Institute There are more minor mentions I found by searching for "451 Research". Some of these pages have been in existence for years.
Furthermore, there are also pages for smaller or similar size companies in the same sector. For instance, Wikibon (although this has issues flagged), Ovum Ltd., Cambashi and others.
More than willing to work with someone or amend as necessary. Owenrog ( talk) 11:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep . No consensus to delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable company written by COI editor. Article reads like an advertisement. There's a long list of references, but none of them meet the requirements of WP:NCORP --
RoySmith
(talk)
03:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, I was aware that there was quite a significant conflict of interest. Reading all this now, I think I'm out of my depth...
My aim was to create a basis from which others could contribute and add, but as you've mentioned, my experience is limited. I raised this conflict of interest with a view of openness - if I hadn't raised this conflict, would it had been regarded as biased? I tried to write neutral, and I used citations (although appreciate now that they're not great)
I do, however, think the page is notable. There are quite a few mentions of the company, which currently do not link to a 451 Research page: Industry analyst Yankee Group Uptime Institute There are more minor mentions I found by searching for "451 Research". Some of these pages have been in existence for years.
Furthermore, there are also pages for smaller or similar size companies in the same sector. For instance, Wikibon (although this has issues flagged), Ovum Ltd., Cambashi and others.
More than willing to work with someone or amend as necessary. Owenrog ( talk) 11:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)