- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep. I note that the book has only a dozen articles, so restructuring, or starting afresh, means removing or resorting only a and handful of articles. - Nabla ( talk) 18:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
A very poor book (e.g. the first non-epon article listed is Marine propeller which is hardly relevant), title needs correcting. DexDor (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- AFAIK the book was mainly created to demonstrate (PDF) rendering capabilities. It contains various visually interesting elements (images, technical diagrams, math formulas etc.) that look good in print. Despite this superficial argument, I still think it could be a valuable resource. Therefore I would recommend to expand/modify the book rather than delete it. Ckepper ( talk) 07:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Don't see why this needs to be deleted. Deletion is not cleanup, and I can conceive of a book dealing with Amphibious Aircrafts.
Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books}
18:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Cleanup would mean renaming, removing irrelevant articles, adding more relevant articles and (possibly) deleting the redirects left at the incorrect title - i.e. it'd be easier to delete and start afresh. Ckepper's comment above suggests that it was intended more as a test/demonstration than an actual encyclopedic book so maybe a move to userspace would be appropriate. DexDor (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep. I note that the book has only a dozen articles, so restructuring, or starting afresh, means removing or resorting only a and handful of articles. - Nabla ( talk) 18:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
A very poor book (e.g. the first non-epon article listed is Marine propeller which is hardly relevant), title needs correcting. DexDor (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- AFAIK the book was mainly created to demonstrate (PDF) rendering capabilities. It contains various visually interesting elements (images, technical diagrams, math formulas etc.) that look good in print. Despite this superficial argument, I still think it could be a valuable resource. Therefore I would recommend to expand/modify the book rather than delete it. Ckepper ( talk) 07:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Don't see why this needs to be deleted. Deletion is not cleanup, and I can conceive of a book dealing with Amphibious Aircrafts.
Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books}
18:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Cleanup would mean renaming, removing irrelevant articles, adding more relevant articles and (possibly) deleting the redirects left at the incorrect title - i.e. it'd be easier to delete and start afresh. Ckepper's comment above suggests that it was intended more as a test/demonstration than an actual encyclopedic book so maybe a move to userspace would be appropriate. DexDor (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.