The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Why do we have this pool? There's no reason we should have an AfD nomination pool for GNAA any more than we should have an AfD nominations pool for any other article. Delete.
Astroguy212:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep Read the "Never" section, and try not to laugh. It's exactly the brand of humor that belongs on Wikipedia. If this discussion had taken place before the 10th nomination, I might have voted to delete based on
WP:BEANS concerns of frivolous nominations motivated by the cultural joke. But now that it's over, there's no reason to delete it. Note that this page has been nominated twice before; someone should please provide the links.
Placeholder account12:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Why do we have this pool? There's no reason we should have an AfD nomination pool for GNAA any more than we should have an AfD nominations pool for any other article. Delete.
Astroguy212:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep Read the "Never" section, and try not to laugh. It's exactly the brand of humor that belongs on Wikipedia. If this discussion had taken place before the 10th nomination, I might have voted to delete based on
WP:BEANS concerns of frivolous nominations motivated by the cultural joke. But now that it's over, there's no reason to delete it. Note that this page has been nominated twice before; someone should please provide the links.
Placeholder account12:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.