This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seemingly purposeless 'stub' in the WP namespace. Not a policy page; not a policy proposal, or indeed an anything proposal. Long-standing merge notices, but little real content to actually merge. Alai 01:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC) this comment copied from
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wikipedia Verb
Delete. Meaningless crap. Useless. Reads like it was written by some out-of-work management consultant—which is a good sign, because it means that companies aren't paying for this bullshit anymore. Doesn't mean they can foist it off on us. — PhilWelch22:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Wiki namespace pages should be subject to particularly strong scrutiny for at least some purpose relating to the project. --
BD2412talk 22:02, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seemingly purposeless 'stub' in the WP namespace. Not a policy page; not a policy proposal, or indeed an anything proposal. Long-standing merge notices, but little real content to actually merge. Alai 01:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC) this comment copied from
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wikipedia Verb
Delete. Meaningless crap. Useless. Reads like it was written by some out-of-work management consultant—which is a good sign, because it means that companies aren't paying for this bullshit anymore. Doesn't mean they can foist it off on us. — PhilWelch22:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Wiki namespace pages should be subject to particularly strong scrutiny for at least some purpose relating to the project. --
BD2412talk 22:02, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.