From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article501st Combat Support Wing
Statusclosed
Request date23:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Requesting partyUnknown
Parties involved 86.139.103.168 ( talk), 84.69.103.65 ( talk), 86.154.40.13 ( talk), 86.143.33.94 ( talk), 86.147.106.246 ( talk)
Mediator(s) Atyndall ( talk · contribs)
CommentParagraph added to article. Issue resolved.

Request details

Having issues with constant reverts to edits of 501st_Combat_Support_Wing with blatant breaking of WP:NPOV and WP:V. User(s) refuse to acknowledge that edits and reverts cannot be sourced and are not within Wikipedia policy.

Who are the involved parties?

What's going on?

Users will not acknowledge violation of Wikipedia policy even after discussion. Users have remained anonymous, giving them free reign to shout insults and put usernames into the articles to further their propaganda.

What would you like to change about that?

Possible administrator intervention; at the least, someone to look over the article and agree that the included content is in violation of WP:NPOV, WP:V, among others.

Mediator notes

Administrative notes

  • None of the involved users have been blocked.

Discussion

Discussion about this case has been taking place here.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article501st Combat Support Wing
Statusclosed
Request date23:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Requesting partyUnknown
Parties involved 86.139.103.168 ( talk), 84.69.103.65 ( talk), 86.154.40.13 ( talk), 86.143.33.94 ( talk), 86.147.106.246 ( talk)
Mediator(s) Atyndall ( talk · contribs)
CommentParagraph added to article. Issue resolved.

Request details

Having issues with constant reverts to edits of 501st_Combat_Support_Wing with blatant breaking of WP:NPOV and WP:V. User(s) refuse to acknowledge that edits and reverts cannot be sourced and are not within Wikipedia policy.

Who are the involved parties?

What's going on?

Users will not acknowledge violation of Wikipedia policy even after discussion. Users have remained anonymous, giving them free reign to shout insults and put usernames into the articles to further their propaganda.

What would you like to change about that?

Possible administrator intervention; at the least, someone to look over the article and agree that the included content is in violation of WP:NPOV, WP:V, among others.

Mediator notes

Administrative notes

  • None of the involved users have been blocked.

Discussion

Discussion about this case has been taking place here.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook