- Request made by: haz ( user talk) 10:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- In the article Jack Abramoff and its talk page.
- Who's involved?
- Myself, Kwh and the IP 62.0.181.94.
- What's going on?
- The anonymous contributor is vandalising the page, making contributions to it against WP:NPOV and adding attack entries to the article's talk page (and talk pages of involved users)
- What would you like to change about that?
- The case needs a mediator to get the anonymous user to back down (the basis of the dispute is anti-Semitism; the user appears to be Jewish and takes a personal view to the man behind the article). I would prefer this not to lead to the user being banned, xe just needs to change xyr ways.
- If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
- Through the Wikipedia e-mail link on my user page.
I wanted to add this summary which I contributed at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts:
- Anonymous IP editor
User:62.0.181.94 at
Talk:Jack Abramoff insists upon making uncivil and insulting suggestions of antisemitism. Editor has indicated by their edits that they are the same person/entity as
User:85.250.166.7,
User:62.0.170.46, and
User:85.250.217.240.
- Although user insists that they are a 'group of people' (and may well be) the IP has only changed in each case once the user(s) earned a ban, indicating ban evasion.
- Has engaged in WP:POINT in the past. [1]
- Has engaged in content removal [2] [3], article vandalism [4], and user page vandalism [5].
- Has launched personal attacks and threats of continued vandalism (and hacking) on user's and article talk pages after being warned against content removal. [6]
- Continually reverts removal of personal attacks and threats from article talk page. [7]
- Consistently fails to use edit summaries or sign talk pages. [8] [9]
- Has indicated that their intention is "to stir up trouble". [10]
- Has engaged in taunting via baseless accusations on Talk pages. [11] [12] [13]
- Has continually accused me of making edits which were made by other users, together with personal attacks. [14]
- Has removed clarifications from talk pages to continue to falsely accuse me personally of making edits which were made by other users. [15]
- Has engaged in legal threats by talking about writing a letter to "Jimmy and the WIK board" [16]
- Has engaged in personal attacks by implying that another editor is a "Jewish SELF HATER" [17]
- Has shown disdain for Wikipedia civility policy after it was explained. [18]
- Is refactoring other editors Talk: comments in a manner which is dismissive and abrasive (The other editor has a "comment", this editor has the "answer".) [19]
- This has previously been reported to WP:AIV and was rejected as "not vandalism per se". Kwh 16:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Also noted: Mediation with regards to this particular editor was requested in a
past case, which was withdrawn when
User:85.250.166.7 was blocked. -
Kwh
17:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm stepping away from this one for a while until someone else cares to do something about it. I think this editor has made an adequate case against themselves. - Kwh 18:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Request made by: haz ( user talk) 10:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- In the article Jack Abramoff and its talk page.
- Who's involved?
- Myself, Kwh and the IP 62.0.181.94.
- What's going on?
- The anonymous contributor is vandalising the page, making contributions to it against WP:NPOV and adding attack entries to the article's talk page (and talk pages of involved users)
- What would you like to change about that?
- The case needs a mediator to get the anonymous user to back down (the basis of the dispute is anti-Semitism; the user appears to be Jewish and takes a personal view to the man behind the article). I would prefer this not to lead to the user being banned, xe just needs to change xyr ways.
- If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
- Through the Wikipedia e-mail link on my user page.
I wanted to add this summary which I contributed at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts:
- Anonymous IP editor
User:62.0.181.94 at
Talk:Jack Abramoff insists upon making uncivil and insulting suggestions of antisemitism. Editor has indicated by their edits that they are the same person/entity as
User:85.250.166.7,
User:62.0.170.46, and
User:85.250.217.240.
- Although user insists that they are a 'group of people' (and may well be) the IP has only changed in each case once the user(s) earned a ban, indicating ban evasion.
- Has engaged in WP:POINT in the past. [1]
- Has engaged in content removal [2] [3], article vandalism [4], and user page vandalism [5].
- Has launched personal attacks and threats of continued vandalism (and hacking) on user's and article talk pages after being warned against content removal. [6]
- Continually reverts removal of personal attacks and threats from article talk page. [7]
- Consistently fails to use edit summaries or sign talk pages. [8] [9]
- Has indicated that their intention is "to stir up trouble". [10]
- Has engaged in taunting via baseless accusations on Talk pages. [11] [12] [13]
- Has continually accused me of making edits which were made by other users, together with personal attacks. [14]
- Has removed clarifications from talk pages to continue to falsely accuse me personally of making edits which were made by other users. [15]
- Has engaged in legal threats by talking about writing a letter to "Jimmy and the WIK board" [16]
- Has engaged in personal attacks by implying that another editor is a "Jewish SELF HATER" [17]
- Has shown disdain for Wikipedia civility policy after it was explained. [18]
- Is refactoring other editors Talk: comments in a manner which is dismissive and abrasive (The other editor has a "comment", this editor has the "answer".) [19]
- This has previously been reported to WP:AIV and was rejected as "not vandalism per se". Kwh 16:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Also noted: Mediation with regards to this particular editor was requested in a
past case, which was withdrawn when
User:85.250.166.7 was blocked. -
Kwh
17:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm stepping away from this one for a while until someone else cares to do something about it. I think this editor has made an adequate case against themselves. - Kwh 18:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)