Inappropiate comments made by Leyasu:
Second are the revisions he keeps making in the Deathrock article which cannot be verified - he provides no links to verifying sources, instead saying things like "...i simply cite most anyone involved in the so-called death rock and goth communities." In a few cases, he has eliminated information which was verified by external sources and placed his opinion instead.
When I told him I would not get into an argument with him, he responded by saying accusing him of being argumentative "counts as a personal attack".
Other users (from the Gothic Metal article) requested informal mediation for Leysau so I'm not the only one who has problems with him. I am also not pleased that the Gothic Metal article (where he is one of the editors) goes into detail explaining how "faggoth" is a term which is meant to be applied to Goths, not Gothic Metal fans, but I'm afraid to bring it up on the talk page out of fear of retaliation.
All I want from Leyasu is for him to stop making inflammatory or disrespectful comments towards me and the other editors of the Deathrock and Gothic Music articles, to and stop editing the Deathrock article unless he can actually cite sources instead of his opinion.
Inappropiate comments made by Leyasu:
Second are the revisions he keeps making in the Deathrock article which cannot be verified - he provides no links to verifying sources, instead saying things like "...i simply cite most anyone involved in the so-called death rock and goth communities." In a few cases, he has eliminated information which was verified by external sources and placed his opinion instead.
When I told him I would not get into an argument with him, he responded by saying accusing him of being argumentative "counts as a personal attack".
Other users (from the Gothic Metal article) requested informal mediation for Leysau so I'm not the only one who has problems with him. I am also not pleased that the Gothic Metal article (where he is one of the editors) goes into detail explaining how "faggoth" is a term which is meant to be applied to Goths, not Gothic Metal fans, but I'm afraid to bring it up on the talk page out of fear of retaliation.
Now the way its used, and was coined, was as an insult against Gothic Metal, Symphonic Metal, and their variations. And also against music considered Goth Music. Now, how does saying that it includes something, which it does when its used as an insult, say it excludes something else? Also, it explains a previous misconception, in that due to the term Faggoth containing the word 'Goth', that Gothic Metal has connection to 'Goths' which it doesnt. Any suggestions on how to better this part of the article, if it offends, is welcome, as it is one of those trying things to write about, such as religion, abortion, or even the holocaust.
All I want from Leyasu is for him to stop making inflammatory or disrespectful comments towards me and the other editors of the Deathrock and Gothic Music articles, to and stop editing the Deathrock article unless he can actually cite sources instead of his opinion.
I had no association with the Death rock articles, but have been one of the parties involved with user ( User:Leyasu) in the Gothic Metal article mentioned, and everything Jessica wrote above is true.
Recently, User:Leyasu "reported" me on the RfA board, falsely accusing me of harassing him and others. User:Leyasu is the one doing the harassing and false accusations, towards myself and editors from several different articles, as you will see here and User talk:Leyasu
A summary of User:Leyasu's conduct:
1. Adding unsourced, unverifable information to articles (or removing information), and refusing to provide sources (or providing sources that do not support the information provided.)
2. Rather than discussing, engaging in revert wars with other editors.
3. Adding frivolous VfD and Merge tags to articles.
4. Calling other users names, such as "ignorant", "meglomaniacal", and attempting to tarnish their reputation by saying they're putting "Vandalism", "POV", or "Bad Faith edits" into the article (when it is obviously the other way around.)
User:Leyasu also wrote this [1] in my talk page:
"im going to quite promptly tell you to go f--k yourself"
"then to be blunt, grow the f--k up"
FYI, he has been blocked twice and both admins/non-admins alike have abandoned trying to work or reason with him. I sincerely hope that Wikipedia's top officials put notice to his behavior and take the appropriate action against it. -- Danteferno 23:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Method of contact and Wikipedia username requested from Jessica; waiting on response. -- NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Inappropiate comments made by Leyasu:
Second are the revisions he keeps making in the Deathrock article which cannot be verified - he provides no links to verifying sources, instead saying things like "...i simply cite most anyone involved in the so-called death rock and goth communities." In a few cases, he has eliminated information which was verified by external sources and placed his opinion instead.
When I told him I would not get into an argument with him, he responded by saying accusing him of being argumentative "counts as a personal attack".
Other users (from the Gothic Metal article) requested informal mediation for Leysau so I'm not the only one who has problems with him. I am also not pleased that the Gothic Metal article (where he is one of the editors) goes into detail explaining how "faggoth" is a term which is meant to be applied to Goths, not Gothic Metal fans, but I'm afraid to bring it up on the talk page out of fear of retaliation.
All I want from Leyasu is for him to stop making inflammatory or disrespectful comments towards me and the other editors of the Deathrock and Gothic Music articles, to and stop editing the Deathrock article unless he can actually cite sources instead of his opinion.
Inappropiate comments made by Leyasu:
Second are the revisions he keeps making in the Deathrock article which cannot be verified - he provides no links to verifying sources, instead saying things like "...i simply cite most anyone involved in the so-called death rock and goth communities." In a few cases, he has eliminated information which was verified by external sources and placed his opinion instead.
When I told him I would not get into an argument with him, he responded by saying accusing him of being argumentative "counts as a personal attack".
Other users (from the Gothic Metal article) requested informal mediation for Leysau so I'm not the only one who has problems with him. I am also not pleased that the Gothic Metal article (where he is one of the editors) goes into detail explaining how "faggoth" is a term which is meant to be applied to Goths, not Gothic Metal fans, but I'm afraid to bring it up on the talk page out of fear of retaliation.
Now the way its used, and was coined, was as an insult against Gothic Metal, Symphonic Metal, and their variations. And also against music considered Goth Music. Now, how does saying that it includes something, which it does when its used as an insult, say it excludes something else? Also, it explains a previous misconception, in that due to the term Faggoth containing the word 'Goth', that Gothic Metal has connection to 'Goths' which it doesnt. Any suggestions on how to better this part of the article, if it offends, is welcome, as it is one of those trying things to write about, such as religion, abortion, or even the holocaust.
All I want from Leyasu is for him to stop making inflammatory or disrespectful comments towards me and the other editors of the Deathrock and Gothic Music articles, to and stop editing the Deathrock article unless he can actually cite sources instead of his opinion.
I had no association with the Death rock articles, but have been one of the parties involved with user ( User:Leyasu) in the Gothic Metal article mentioned, and everything Jessica wrote above is true.
Recently, User:Leyasu "reported" me on the RfA board, falsely accusing me of harassing him and others. User:Leyasu is the one doing the harassing and false accusations, towards myself and editors from several different articles, as you will see here and User talk:Leyasu
A summary of User:Leyasu's conduct:
1. Adding unsourced, unverifable information to articles (or removing information), and refusing to provide sources (or providing sources that do not support the information provided.)
2. Rather than discussing, engaging in revert wars with other editors.
3. Adding frivolous VfD and Merge tags to articles.
4. Calling other users names, such as "ignorant", "meglomaniacal", and attempting to tarnish their reputation by saying they're putting "Vandalism", "POV", or "Bad Faith edits" into the article (when it is obviously the other way around.)
User:Leyasu also wrote this [1] in my talk page:
"im going to quite promptly tell you to go f--k yourself"
"then to be blunt, grow the f--k up"
FYI, he has been blocked twice and both admins/non-admins alike have abandoned trying to work or reason with him. I sincerely hope that Wikipedia's top officials put notice to his behavior and take the appropriate action against it. -- Danteferno 23:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Method of contact and Wikipedia username requested from Jessica; waiting on response. -- NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)