MEDIATOR ISSUED FINAL OPINION
Greetings, so far, the discussion on the JH page seems civil enough to me, and I wonder why the pro-JH's (for lack of a better term) are critical of the stance taken by 12.217.121.245. Seems to me that the issue is over the reference quotations. To date, none of the pro-JH's deny the existence of these quotations, so are they in the referenced book or not? Steven McCrary 23:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
From mediator: To 12.217.121.245, please provide an exact citation of the reference quotation: author, title, publisher, page number. I realize that the title and page number for some other references have been posted; how about this one please? Is it possible that you could email me a scanned image of the page? My email address is stevelindamccrary@msn.com. Thanks, SteveMc 22:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Since User 12.217.121.245 has nothing more than the referenced text to substantiate the text, it appears that the statement should be modified to be more consistent with the referenced book. Laura74 I suggest that the text be modified, then it may become necessary to enforce your position in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Good luck, SteveMc 01:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
MEDIATOR ISSUED FINAL OPINION
Greetings, so far, the discussion on the JH page seems civil enough to me, and I wonder why the pro-JH's (for lack of a better term) are critical of the stance taken by 12.217.121.245. Seems to me that the issue is over the reference quotations. To date, none of the pro-JH's deny the existence of these quotations, so are they in the referenced book or not? Steven McCrary 23:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
From mediator: To 12.217.121.245, please provide an exact citation of the reference quotation: author, title, publisher, page number. I realize that the title and page number for some other references have been posted; how about this one please? Is it possible that you could email me a scanned image of the page? My email address is stevelindamccrary@msn.com. Thanks, SteveMc 22:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Since User 12.217.121.245 has nothing more than the referenced text to substantiate the text, it appears that the statement should be modified to be more consistent with the referenced book. Laura74 I suggest that the text be modified, then it may become necessary to enforce your position in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Good luck, SteveMc 01:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)