The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn and request speedy delete for no evidence of permission to release as GFDL. -
Nv8200ptalk20:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; used in an article that was deleted for being autobiographical and not notable (Brett K admitted to being Brett King and also uploaded this image). Discussion for that deletion can be found
here.
RobDe68 (
talk)
07:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Unencyclopedic and orphaned. This is too low-quality to be useful for the Replicas of the Statue of Liberty page or anything else.
Metros (
talk)
14:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I disagree with the deletion of this image. The article in its current state only shows well-known replicas in prominent locations. This image shows that Statue of Liberty replicas are used in various ways and placed in many unique locations. If the quality is an issue, I will be happy to take a proper picture of it, but I don't want to go through that trouble if it's just going to be immediately deleted by Metros, who has a history of
Wikistalking me.
Rhythmnation2004 (
talk)
14:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)reply
orphaned image (after I had it replaced on the one page it was used on) and it has been replaced by a better licensed version. This image was licensed witht he GFDL-presumed tag and the new image
Image:Tanemahuta2.jpg is cleanly licensed.
Jordan 1972 (
talk)
14:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - given the image is in use and that as a fair use image it is required to be low quality, I am not quite sure what the problem is here. It is of high enough quality that I can tell what the cover looks like.--
Jordan 1972 (
talk)
23:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Unencyclopedic: it's a collage of the cliché tourist Paris with little informative value. The city depicted in this collage has more to do with Amélie and Moulin Rouge than with the real city of Paris as of 2008. None of the modern districts of Paris are shown, such as La Défense, Montparnasse, Bercy, Les Halles, La Villette. It's more the personal vision of the person who made the collage than an objective presentation of Paris today.
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds (and less than 10% of the length of the track). This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline. ★ BigrTex23:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn and request speedy delete for no evidence of permission to release as GFDL. -
Nv8200ptalk20:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; used in an article that was deleted for being autobiographical and not notable (Brett K admitted to being Brett King and also uploaded this image). Discussion for that deletion can be found
here.
RobDe68 (
talk)
07:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Unencyclopedic and orphaned. This is too low-quality to be useful for the Replicas of the Statue of Liberty page or anything else.
Metros (
talk)
14:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I disagree with the deletion of this image. The article in its current state only shows well-known replicas in prominent locations. This image shows that Statue of Liberty replicas are used in various ways and placed in many unique locations. If the quality is an issue, I will be happy to take a proper picture of it, but I don't want to go through that trouble if it's just going to be immediately deleted by Metros, who has a history of
Wikistalking me.
Rhythmnation2004 (
talk)
14:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)reply
orphaned image (after I had it replaced on the one page it was used on) and it has been replaced by a better licensed version. This image was licensed witht he GFDL-presumed tag and the new image
Image:Tanemahuta2.jpg is cleanly licensed.
Jordan 1972 (
talk)
14:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - given the image is in use and that as a fair use image it is required to be low quality, I am not quite sure what the problem is here. It is of high enough quality that I can tell what the cover looks like.--
Jordan 1972 (
talk)
23:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Unencyclopedic: it's a collage of the cliché tourist Paris with little informative value. The city depicted in this collage has more to do with Amélie and Moulin Rouge than with the real city of Paris as of 2008. None of the modern districts of Paris are shown, such as La Défense, Montparnasse, Bercy, Les Halles, La Villette. It's more the personal vision of the person who made the collage than an objective presentation of Paris today.
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds. This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline, in fact no rationale at all. ★ BigrTex23:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The
WP:Music Samples guideline recommends that except in exceptional cases, music samples should be no longer than 30 seconds (and less than 10% of the length of the track). This sample provides no reason to exceed the guideline. ★ BigrTex23:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)reply