possible film poster claimed as 'self', user has history of altering images such as this, so no way to tell if this is the original or not (original anyone?)
SkierRMH (
talk)
03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NFCC#1 (replaceability). I think that all US soldiers have their picture taken by the US Government, which would mean that public domain photos of all these soldiers could be found. Failing that, all of these soldiers are still living, so photos could still be taken of them. —
Remember the dot(
talk)04:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep However this instance of the US soldiers can't be found in the public domain. And the article is about when they're taken as POWs --
Esemono (
talk)
04:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Orphaned - there doesn't seem to be a corresponding article in which it could be used. If it's a screenshot, the GFDL license is suspect. Black Falcon(
Talk)06:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
This is the logo of Warid Telecom though editor who uploaded it claimed it as his own work. I strongly suggest him to change licensing information otherwise it will be a violation of copyright. Moreover, to keep this image on Wikipedia, he can add a Fair Use Rationale. Cheers! --
Niaz(Talk • Contribs)09:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Deleted. It appears one of the images was both here and on commons, something I didn't notice before I deleted it here. No damage (what so ever) done.
-- Sverdrup (
talk)
01:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The editorial use of logos, to cover the subject of the logo, is a textbook case of fair use. The logo itself is not replaceable with a photo of the logo on a building. We don't replace good logos with photos that happen to include the logo.
Rhobite (
talk)
23:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep — there are hundreds, if not thousands, of logo images (tagged with {{
non-free logo}}) for which fair-use is appropriate, so this is clearly a standard practice. Rhobite sums it up nicely. —
Andrwsc (
talk·contribs)
23:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. Per reasons above. Briefly, this is the logo. Other images containing it aren't. It would not make sense to switch.
Jared(t)12:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)reply
possible film poster claimed as 'self', user has history of altering images such as this, so no way to tell if this is the original or not (original anyone?)
SkierRMH (
talk)
03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NFCC#1 (replaceability). I think that all US soldiers have their picture taken by the US Government, which would mean that public domain photos of all these soldiers could be found. Failing that, all of these soldiers are still living, so photos could still be taken of them. —
Remember the dot(
talk)04:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep However this instance of the US soldiers can't be found in the public domain. And the article is about when they're taken as POWs --
Esemono (
talk)
04:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Orphaned - there doesn't seem to be a corresponding article in which it could be used. If it's a screenshot, the GFDL license is suspect. Black Falcon(
Talk)06:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
This is the logo of Warid Telecom though editor who uploaded it claimed it as his own work. I strongly suggest him to change licensing information otherwise it will be a violation of copyright. Moreover, to keep this image on Wikipedia, he can add a Fair Use Rationale. Cheers! --
Niaz(Talk • Contribs)09:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Deleted. It appears one of the images was both here and on commons, something I didn't notice before I deleted it here. No damage (what so ever) done.
-- Sverdrup (
talk)
01:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The editorial use of logos, to cover the subject of the logo, is a textbook case of fair use. The logo itself is not replaceable with a photo of the logo on a building. We don't replace good logos with photos that happen to include the logo.
Rhobite (
talk)
23:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep — there are hundreds, if not thousands, of logo images (tagged with {{
non-free logo}}) for which fair-use is appropriate, so this is clearly a standard practice. Rhobite sums it up nicely. —
Andrwsc (
talk·contribs)
23:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. Per reasons above. Briefly, this is the logo. Other images containing it aren't. It would not make sense to switch.
Jared(t)12:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)reply