August 27
-
Image:ZKeyHebrew.PNG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Epson291 (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ZEEGRASS_ZEEROK.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Zeegrass (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ZBL_-_Omot_za_prvu_demo_kasetu_1_manji.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Branislavsmuk (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ZOLTRON.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Stickertraders (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ZThree_Slim_Jims.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Mikercool1 (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ZNN_tv.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
ZombieNotes (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Zaki_nassif...jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Totheleftofmee (
notify |
contribs).
- appears to be a
derivative work (photo of a photo - his head is disembodied, plus the glare)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 00:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Taken from the website mentioned in the article. Possible copyvio.
De728631 (
talk) 02:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Zane_Savage_X.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Sameyejara (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:MissPooja3.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Bal537 (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Pooja3.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Bal537 (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:MissPooja1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Bal537 (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Interview--XGEN.pdf (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ajaydata (
notify |
contribs).
- PDF file (a bad format that should be avoided) which is unused and contains the interview of a non-notable person. As an interview, it is almost certainly either a copyvio or original research.
J Milburn (
talk) 11:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - while the below conversation may truly reflect that the image is correctly licenced, it does appear on a commercial website (www.brettanderson.co.uk) and there needs to be an OTRS email to confirm that it has been freely licenced - Will drop a note on uploaders talk page about this -
Peripitus
(Talk) 04:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:BrettAnderson2008.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
P586 (
notify |
contribs).
- Photo tagged as {self|cc-by-3.0}, but author is stated to be "Paul Khera" --
Wbrz (
talk) 14:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Note the user name P586. P like Paul? If he doesn't respond to the notifications on his talk page, delete per nomination though.
De728631 (
talk) 01:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
i've uploaded some photographs which i own, to allow them to be freely used, which are all listed for deletion, why do you have copyright choices from your list which mean that the image will be deleted, surely better not to let them be uploaded, rather than involving me in excessive admin, for trying to give you images for free, essentially i think wiki is great, but i dont have the will to work out what you want regarding the copyright of my images —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
P586 (
talk •
contribs) 07:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- That seems to be a "Promotional photo". --
Wbrz (
talk) 19:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
whether it's promotional or not doesnt seem to have any relevance to it's copyright status?
There are countless promotional images in wikipedia
Your comment doesnt answer any of my queries
You can check other images on my site www.paulkhera.com
The image that replaces it doesnt show much of the man's face and is blurred
help me out here...
What kind of proof are you looking for that I am the owner of the image?
paulkhera —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
P586 (
talk •
contribs) 22:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
comment:
User P586 is Paul Khera (of www.paulkhera.com) owner of the image copyright. The picture he submitted is a recent picture of singer-songwriter Brett Anderson taken in Spring 2008 as the musician was recording his latest album "Wilderness". He is credited on the album and is also the photo-editor on the website www.brettanderson.co.uk . I have seen Mr Khera taking photographs of Mr Anderson in a professional capacity and the picture he submitted depicts the musician and the atmosphere of his music very well - as in "a picture says a thousand words". Furthermore, I have corresponded a few times with P586 regarding Mr Khera's photography and I can vouch that P586 and Mr Khera are the same person and therefore there is no breach of copyright and no reason for deletion. - d.a. hoffman, writer - www.geocities.com/zebras54 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.18.188.240 (
talk) 11:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
-
Image:In Love Again.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Billy4kate (
notify |
contribs).
- Unused, at best useless as original research, at worst misleading.
J Milburn (
talk) 14:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Wikipic omernadeem.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
W1a2s3e4y5 (
notify |
contribs).
- Picture for a soon to be deleted article. Source says from google. Possible copyvio.
Undead Warrior (
talk) 15:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Wikipic omernadeem1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
W1a2s3e4y5 (
notify |
contribs).
- Picture for a soon to be deleted article. Sourced as facebook, but might be copyvio or just a self photograph. Wikipedia is not the place to upload personal self pictures.
Undead Warrior (
talk) 15:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Blair logo.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Cmc0 (
notify |
contribs).
- does not increase understanding.
ViperSnake151 16:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete - completely unnecessary non-free image for any of the articles it's currently used in. --
Damiens.rf 16:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Paris_Hilton_Responds_to_McCain_Ad.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Justmeherenow (
notify |
contribs).
- Following the closure of
this discussion and deletion of that image,
Justmeherenow has reuploaded a noncropped version of the still from the video. This image fails the NFCC for all the same reasons that the previous version did. Now that the article has been merged, there is even less of an argument for keeping it since there are numerous free images of Paris Hilton already available on that page.
Cumulus Clouds (
talk) 16:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete as it's basically a reupload of deleted material. Although uncropped, the use and origin of this image is basically the same of the previously deleted file. --
Damiens.rf 16:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Thomas_Sankara.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Acntx (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Jean_Servais_Rififi.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Tlinsenm (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:New_Yorker_1980_10_27_p194.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Tomgally (
notify |
contribs).
- fails
WP:NFCC8 - don't need copyrighted image to demonstrate colon usage (can be easily conveyed in words)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Is this really copyrightable? Doesn't {{
PD-ineligible}} apply here? If not, delete per nominator. --
Damiens.rf 17:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Wouldn't the passage be copyrighted? I feel like this would be the same case as a pdf copy of a page out of a book. It's not so much that the font is copyright (since it isn't), but that the information in the text is.
Cumulus Clouds (
talk) 17:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, the text itself is copyrighted. Obviously this isn't a huge deal, since it's a short excerpt, but it's just totally unnecessary to the article.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Indeed, very subtle. We would have to claim fair use of the text, in order to illustrate the discussion about The New Yorker's witting style. And while I think this would be a good example of fair usage, I'm with Calliopejen1 that we can do without this in Wikipedia, and thus,
WP:NFCC#8 isn't satisfied. Delete. --
Damiens.rf 17:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Aleko-moskvitch.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Josef_Sábl_cz (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Prien-hitler-schmidt.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Sherurcij (
notify |
contribs).
- copyright holder not identified, also violates
WP:NFCC8 (doesn't add significantly to readers' understanding). note that we already have a free image showing what he looks like.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:MorrisonTribute.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Sherurcij (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:FvSwWP.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ansbachdragoner (
notify |
contribs).
- violates
WP:NFCC3a (already have another nonfree image showing what he looks like),
WP:NFCC8 (doesn't add anything beyond the other nonfree image)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Someone might want to write an article about Walter Plöw who is on the image.
De728631 (
talk) 02:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Except that there is already another nonfree image of Walter Plow in the article.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 06:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Um, the article linked to FvSwWP.jpg is about
Fritz von Scholz and yes, von Scholz has got two non-free images. But
Walter Plöw doesn't even exist yet and that image seems to be the only one of him on here.
De728631 (
talk) 11:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Sorry. Still, we cannot keep around a nonfree image because it might be useful someday. It is not needed in the FvS article, so it should be removed. Then it is orphaned, but we can't keep orphaned nonfree images. If it ever needs to be undeleted, we can undelete it.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:FritzvScholz1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ansbachdragoner (
notify |
contribs).
- violates WP:NFCC3a (already have another nonfree image showing what he looks like), WP:NFCC8 (doesn't add anything beyond the other nonfree image)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Totally redundant.
De728631 (
talk) 02:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:GMSoutside.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Bensun (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Dogpatch_USA_Ticket.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
The_stuart (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Deisenhofer_-_near_Caen,_1944.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ansbachdragoner (
notify |
contribs).
- violates
WP:NFCC3a - redundant to
Image:Deisenhofer.jpg (also nonfree, used in same article)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, WP:NFCC3a is about having multiple non-free images that say "Here is the subject from this angle", "here he is from another angle", this isn't the case here; this is an image of the subject in the middle of a battle; and the image represents no financial loss to the copyright holder (the Third Reich, now Germany government). It would seem unwise to delete.
Sherurcij (
speaker for the dead) 18:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- But how does this add anything additional to the article that contributes to readers' understanding?
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 18:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- It contributes by showing that, while being called an "educated SS-man", which associates a leading role at a desk, this guy did not hide in a background office but saw combat in the field. Keep.
De728631 (
talk) 01:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- And why can't we just write that he participated in combat
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 06:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Because I see the fact tag crowd jumping on the article and question it until someone digs out an easily accessible source other than this image.
De728631 (
talk) 11:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- If no reliable source has ever written that he has participated in battle, clearly the fact is not important then?
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete - I don't see the need to see the guy at the battle field. --
Damiens.rf 18:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete Very blurry
Mrmariokartguy (
talk) 01:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:ST-VOY_Unforgettable.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Living_Witness.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Vis_a_Vis.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_The_Killing_Game,Part1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Retrospect.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Random_Thoughts.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Year_of_Hell,Part2.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_The_Chute.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Remember.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_False_Profits.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_The_Swarm.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Futures_End,Part1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Warlord.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Futures_End,Part2.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_The_Q_and_the_Grey.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Fair_Trade.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Alter_Ego.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Darkling.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Scorpion,Part1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:ST-VOY_Rise.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thealok (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Save-ironcat,_Otakon_2003.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Mitsukai (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:IMG_0076.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Thetruthaboutfgs (
notify |
contribs).
- violates
WP:NFCC3a (redundant to
Image:Hellgreenback.jpg)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: not sure whether the presentation of non-free elements in this image overshadows the creative work of the photographer to such an extent we'd have to treat the photograph as a non-free work in the first place.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 05:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:China_hellnotekennedy.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Tktruong2 (
notify |
contribs).
- violates
WP:NFCC3a (redundant to
Image:Hellgreenback.jpg)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete. Given that typical designs of these notes are discussed extensively in the article, I'd tend to find two contrastive examples (like the US-dollar one and the Chinese one) permissible, but a third is surely not needed; the fact that it shows Kennedy can easily be understood by text alone and any further details of design are not crucial for the context.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 05:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Brody-14WGdSS.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ansbachdragoner (
notify |
contribs).
- no copyright holder identified, very poor quality so it doesn't contribute to readers' understanding anyways
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 17:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:ClarencePage.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Mhym (
notify |
contribs).
- Copyrighted image of a living journalist.
Damiens.rf 17:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:OttoAbbadabbaBerman.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Mistergrind (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Harpo_a_la_Dali_.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Yossarian (
notify |
contribs).
- violates
WP:NFCC8 - does not add significantly to readers' understanding (several other images of him already in article)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 18:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Strong keep Salvador Dali didn't portrait anyone who asked for it. A portrait by Dali underlines the importance of a subject, Harpo Marx in this case.
De728631 (
talk) 01:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- We don't need to show the painting to prove that Harpo Marx is important. If the fact of the painting is needed, it can be mentioned in the text.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 06:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Samael_Aun_Weor_Meditation.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
T._Baphomet (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Rochon_Sculpture_Gallery_outside.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Ianthegecko (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:HeinrichiHitler.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Sherurcij (
notify |
contribs).
- With all due respect, bullshit; an image of Heinrichi and Hitler together at a party says a lot more than an image of a man in a hat. There is no private copyright holder, the image perfectly satisifies FU criteria.
Sherurcij (
speaker for the dead) 20:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- This is your only warning to be civil and refrain from personal attacks on Wikipedia. Intimidation in IFD will not be tolerated.
Cumulus Clouds (
talk) 20:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete - image is not helpful for the understanding of the article. --
Damiens.rf 20:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Salvatore_Riina.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Orzetto (
notify |
contribs).
- copyright holder unknown, possibly replaceable, Image:Salvatore Riina ID Card.jpg is a better nonfree image to identify him anyways because it's not a press photo
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 19:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Queens1977GoldenJubileeMedal.gif (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Dowew (
notify |
contribs).
- replaceable with a free photo (even if the object is necessarily nonfree). 60,000 of these were distributed, we should be able to take a photo of one of them.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 19:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- A question about this, if the object itself is copyrighted, what is the issue here; any image uploaded, regardless of who takes the picture, will always be non-free. I don't think there is any question an image (which will always be non-free) is warranted in the article. I am willing to be convinced,
but currently, keep. --
Jordan 1972 (
talk) 21:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Here though, we have to invoke the doctrine of fair use with respect to two copyrights - that of the photographer, and that of the medal-maker. We should delete this in favor of a photo whose licensing allows us to only worry about the latter.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 00:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete -- I have been convinced -- it makes sense. I wonder tho, is there somewhere that it could be posted that the article will need a new image? I can easily see that once this image is deleted, someone will come along and realize that there is no image in the article and then go looking for one -- the easy way to find one will likely result in one with the same issues. Is there a Medal group or a photo-request page we can notify?--
Jordan 1972 (
talk) 16:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Found a project and have notified them
here.--
Jordan 1972 (
talk) 16:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Thanks for the heads-up - image has been replaced
PalawanOz (
talk) 04:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Cap_ufrj_wall.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
LaVega (
notify |
contribs).
* 'delete - clear case of nfcc2 violation. --
Damiens.rf 21:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Moidedos.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Kikoogay (
notify |
contribs).
-
Kikoogay is a vandal on French wikipedia (using
sock puppets). He uploaded this image from rotten.com (so there is a probable copyvio) in order to
vandalize an article.
Chphe
(d) 20:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Fonddecranfacile.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Kikoogay (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:Howe802.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
MJR (
notify |
contribs).
-
Image:DDandBBDougherty.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Dankstick (
notify |
contribs).
- copyright holder not identified, fails
WP:NFCC8 (does not significantly contribute to readers' understanding)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 20:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- delete decorative image. --
Damiens.rf 21:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:TonyEsposito.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
MJR (
notify |
contribs).
- Copyrighted image of a living person (
WP:NFCC#1). Additionally, this is an image used to illustrate a hockey player's bio, that was copied from this player's bio at a hockey specialized site. That hockey-site may see our web-accessible bio as competition, what makes our use completely unfair.
Damiens.rf 21:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Kryptonian.svg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
PJonDevelopment (
notify |
contribs).
- The file is a vector image the uploader created (stated as original source) based on elements from the Superman comics published by DC Comics and used within the television show Smallville. At best this is a character font for English, at worst a constructed language. In either case it is an element that would be protected under copyright by DC, not the uploader. Scans of the use of the graphic element in either the comics or the television show would be reasonable fair use. This isn't.
J Greb (
talk) 23:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I think we used to be able to speedy images if they were uploaded with the wrong license, not sure if that still applies.
Hiding
T 09:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Question: how is this image different from the similar
Image:Interlac Landscape.JPG? According to the article, both are simply
substitution ciphers (although the Kryptonian graphic doesn't give the correspondence). Does the Interlac image have similar copyright problems? —
Josiah Rowe (
talk •
contribs) 18:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- The honest answer is no. The only difference is that I wasn't aware the interlac image was there. And being a "simply substitution ciphers* isn't a good defense when the image is of a typeface/font. And that's what both this and interlac are: fonts created for a specific purpose within the comics. They have been used both as "objects" — part of the artwork — and as "text" — within word balloons and captions. The interlac one should be nommed as well.
And IIRC the interlac "key", or something close to it, was published by DC on a letters page. That image would be valid to pull for a NFC image. Almost any othe "key" is going to be from a source book, which isn't usable. Again, the best likely image for wither is going to be a scan of the font in use. I know there are a few good images from Smallville for the Kryptonese, and one really good Legion" cover for interlac. -
J Greb (
talk) 22:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Bat Logo.svg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
PJonDevelopment (
notify |
contribs).
- The file is a vector image the uploader created (stated as original source) based on a key visual element for the character Batman from comics published by DC Comics. This is an element that would be protected under copyright and trademark by DC, not the uploader. Scans of the use of the element in either the comics would be reasonable fair use. This isn't. As a side note, I've changed the liscence from {{
PD-self}} to {{
non-free logo}} but the source is still very questionable.
J Greb (
talk) 23:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I think we used to be able to speedy images if they were uploaded with teh wrong license, not sure if that still applies.
Hiding
T 09:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Superman Logo.svg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
PJonDevelopment (
notify |
contribs).
- The file is a vector image the uploader created (stated as original source) based on a key visual element for the character Superman from comics published by DC Comics. This is an element that would be protected under copyright and trademark by DC, not the uploader. Scans of the use of the element in either the comics would be reasonable fair use. This isn't. As a side note, I've changed the liscence from {{
PD-self}} to {{
non-free logo}} but the source is still very questionable.
J Greb (
talk) 23:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I think we used to be able to speedy images if they were uploaded with teh wrong license, not sure if that still applies.
Hiding
T 09:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
-
Image:Devils.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs) - uploaded by
Evhs00 (
notify |
contribs).
- Orphan, probably copyvio. Uploader is indef blocked as a sockpuppet, most/many of his other uploaded images have already been deleted as copyvios.
Dori (
Talk •
Contribs) 23:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reply