- - uploaded by Slippyfish1091 ( notify | contribs).
- Only used in a speedily deleted article. - Mike Rosoft 00:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
These images were moved from Feb. 23 to allow for more discussion. - Nv8200p talk 01:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
None of the below deletion reasons are valid; they're not copyright violations because they have been released for reuse. There's no explicit granting of permission for modification, but there's no reason to believe it isn't since they've been released without restriction besides attribution. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 03:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is a very valid reason to believe that there is no permission for derivative works: because it isn't explicted or even implicitly stated in the license. -- Iamunknown 20:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- If there's no explicit permission to modify an image, we don't assume we have that extra right. —
Rebelguys2
talk
17:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- consensus seems to be they're free enough for commons, so there's no reason they're unfree for here. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 13:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jniemenmaa ( notify | contribs).
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Commons image coming through -- BigDT 03:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Joshbaumgartner ( notify | contribs).
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Souljourn777 ( notify | contribs).
- Logo for not-notable organization (their only existence is in form of a website, as far as I can see). — Egil 04:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned JPEG version of Image:Mississippi counties map Katrina disaster area.gif. — Bkell ( talk) 04:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by FactoidCow ( notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, see link. We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events... Please do not use them elsewhere." –- kungming·2 (Talk) 04:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by ANNAfoxlover ( notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, see link. We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events... Please do not use them elsewhere." –- kungming·2 (Talk) 04:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- OB. Superseded by SVG version: Image:1st15th Royal New South Wales Lancers unit patch.svg — MithrandirMage 05:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Image:GoogleAndyWarhol.gif
-
Image:GoogleVenusTransit.gif
-
Image:GoogleVanGogh.gif
-
Image:GoogleThanksgiving1999.jpg
-
Image:GoogleBastilleDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleStPatricksDay2002.gif
-
Image:GoogleRayCharles.gif
-
Image:GooglePicasso.gif
-
Image:GoogleTorinoOlympics.gif
-
Image:GoogleNewYear2007.gif
-
Image:GoogleMothersDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleMonet.gif
-
Image:GooglePietMondrian.gif
-
Image:GoogleMLK.gif
-
Image:GoogleMichelangelo.gif
-
Image:GoogleLeapYear.gif
-
Image:GoogleJuly4.gif
-
Image:GoogleHalloween.gif
-
Image:GoogleFrankLloydWright.gif
-
Image:GoogleFlight.gif
-
Image:GoogleFathersDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleMCEscher.gif
-
Image:GoogleVote.gif
-
Image:GoogleEinstein.gif
-
Image:GoogleEdvardMunch.gif
- Image:GoogleEaster.jpg
- Image:GoogleEarthDay.gif
- Image:GoogleDNA.gif
- Image:GoogleDaVinci.gif
- Image:GoogleChildrensDay.gif
- Image:GoogleBraille.gif
- Image:GoogleCanadaDay.gif
The images above were uploaded by User:ANNAfoxlover.
- Image:ValentineGoogle07.gif -- uploaded by User:9591353082.
- Image:GoogleCWC07.gif -- uploaded by User:Thugchildz.
These images violate copyright, as stated on Google's official webpage regarding Holiday Doodles. link Google policy states: We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events. We've put them in this online museum for your amusement. Please do not use them elsewhere.
Furthermore, the use of such logos do not particularly serve to illustrate the company in question ( Google), as the official logo is used for the company's article, with a fair-use rationale. The images are readily accessible on Google's webpages (linked to on Google logo) and are disorganized and CV on Wikipedia. These images are not used on any current Wikipedia article. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 05:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Tittaliewinks ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, insufficient context to determine notability. —
Bkell (
talk)
06:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- This image was used in the now-deleted article Neal Hockett, which has been deleted twice [1] for non-notability. — Bkell ( talk) 06:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ryankelley ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Core desat 07:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Methodofimages32.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Methodofimages32.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Extensionimage2.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, no explanation of notability, claim of GFDL-self is dubious. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for advertising of a website. — — Ocatecir Talk 11:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for spam article. — — Ocatecir Talk 11:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for spam article — — Ocatecir Talk 11:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
- UE- Abu badali ( talk) 11:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am speedily deleting this image because it clearly has a bad fair use tag. It is a photo montage where there is an "aura" from the source photograph of a Mickey Mouse toy which is superimposed on an out of focus bus with tall grass in front of the bus. The toy is holding a bag and a cell phone. This is low enough quality that no company would ever release it as a promotional photo. Jesse Viviano 07:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation Orphaned Unencyclopedic ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 11:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=delete){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=history){kind=link}
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 11:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
- Unused, unencyclopedia personal photo. User's only contribution. Iamunknown 12:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Rdstephens ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, needs a lot of cropping if it's going to be used. — Bkell ( talk) 14:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- TIME magazine cover used only to illustrate the article of the person who is on the cover; see the seventh fair-use counterexample. — Bkell ( talk) 14:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk)
14:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am unable to notify the uploader, because her talk page is protected. — Bkell ( talk) 14:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Freedom skies ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality -- Selket Talk 15:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Freedom skies ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- Selket Talk 15:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Pandacakes ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,unenclyopedic,vandalism account
- - uploaded by Pandacakes ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,unenclyopedic,vandalism account
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Bigr Tex 15:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by ChibiTails ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Bigr Tex 15:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Bigr Tex 15:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- non-orphaned image. The uploader has changed the text under the licensing heading 5 times in 24 hours. Each change progressively made the image more unfree. Given this image is easily replaceable , this questionable licensed image should be deleted. Also, no source is specifically provided, but the original tag was PD-self. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 17:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- - uploaded by User:Jellery ( notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic and being used to advance a political view point — Regan123 20:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
{hangon}
- - uploaded by Bigwickermonkey ( notify | contribs).
- Uploaded for use in now-deleted Walrus (band). Possible copyright violation. -- Slowking Man 20:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is no copyright violation here. Please leave this image alone. Thanks. -- Bigwickermonkey 16:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic orphan. ~ Bigr Tex 17:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bigwickermonkey ( notify | contribs).
- Uploaded for use in now-deleted Walrus (band). Possible copyright violation. -- Slowking Man 20:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is no copyright violation here. Please leave this image alone.-- Bigwickermonkey 16:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic orphan. ~ Bigr Tex 17:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
images by slowpokeiv
- Image:UWM Golda Meir Library Detail.jpg
- Image:UWM Golda Meir Library.jpg
- Image:UWM Mitchell Hall Fisheye.jpg
- Image:UWM Mitchell Hall.jpg
Orphan images. Miaers 23:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Typing error in name, obsoleted by Image:Dnepropetrovsk 9859s.JPG
-- Toddy1 23:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image, used to illustrate an article's section containing only external links. Doesn't seem to add significantly to the article- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image showing a given artist playing a keyboard. The image doesn't seem to add anything to the article that couldn't be done by a free image.- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I object. If both this and the image below are to be removed from article, there would be no images illustrating what Derek does for living - performing on stage. On the another note, this, and the image below, illustrate Derek's approach to playing (over-the-top, flashy movements, the attitude ...). It perfectly captures his character, and THAT cannot be replaced by text. Also, equivalent free image is not know to exist. --
RockyMM
17:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that text alone could illustrate "what Derek does for living", for instance, the text "performing on stage". Also, I see no mention to his "approach to playing" being "over-the-top flashy movements" not about his "attitude" in the article's current version (if someone plans to add it, please be sure to read Wikipedia:No Original Research and Wikipedia:Reliable sources first. The article has enough problems as it is now.). And I, for one, wasn't able to deduce from the image alone that his approach to playing was over-the-top, etc. I still believe that the image doesn't add anything to the article that couldn't be done by a free image -- Abu badali ( talk) 20:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image showing a given artist (the same from nomination above) playing a keyboard. It's use on the artist's bio or in the keyboard's brand's article doesn't seem to convey any significant information that couldn't be conveyed with text or a free image. -- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I object. Other than reasons I stated for the image above, this image illustrates product - Nord Lead 2. To my best knowledge, there is no equivalent free image. --
RockyMM
17:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Even if I would agree with the reasons stated on the image above, why would we use 2 unfree images for the same purpose? As for illustrating a product, couldn't that be done with free material alone? -- Abu badali ( talk) 20:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Slippyfish1091 ( notify | contribs).
- Only used in a speedily deleted article. - Mike Rosoft 00:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
These images were moved from Feb. 23 to allow for more discussion. - Nv8200p talk 01:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
None of the below deletion reasons are valid; they're not copyright violations because they have been released for reuse. There's no explicit granting of permission for modification, but there's no reason to believe it isn't since they've been released without restriction besides attribution. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 03:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is a very valid reason to believe that there is no permission for derivative works: because it isn't explicted or even implicitly stated in the license. -- Iamunknown 20:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- If there's no explicit permission to modify an image, we don't assume we have that extra right. —
Rebelguys2
talk
17:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- consensus seems to be they're free enough for commons, so there's no reason they're unfree for here. Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 13:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jniemenmaa ( notify | contribs).
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Commons image coming through -- BigDT 03:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Joshbaumgartner ( notify | contribs).
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- CV. The Finnish Defence Forces allow reproduction of the image, but there is no indication modification is allowed. — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Souljourn777 ( notify | contribs).
- Logo for not-notable organization (their only existence is in form of a website, as far as I can see). — Egil 04:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned JPEG version of Image:Mississippi counties map Katrina disaster area.gif. — Bkell ( talk) 04:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by FactoidCow ( notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, see link. We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events... Please do not use them elsewhere." –- kungming·2 (Talk) 04:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by ANNAfoxlover ( notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, see link. We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events... Please do not use them elsewhere." –- kungming·2 (Talk) 04:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- OB. Superseded by SVG version: Image:1st15th Royal New South Wales Lancers unit patch.svg — MithrandirMage 05:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Image:GoogleAndyWarhol.gif
-
Image:GoogleVenusTransit.gif
-
Image:GoogleVanGogh.gif
-
Image:GoogleThanksgiving1999.jpg
-
Image:GoogleBastilleDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleStPatricksDay2002.gif
-
Image:GoogleRayCharles.gif
-
Image:GooglePicasso.gif
-
Image:GoogleTorinoOlympics.gif
-
Image:GoogleNewYear2007.gif
-
Image:GoogleMothersDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleMonet.gif
-
Image:GooglePietMondrian.gif
-
Image:GoogleMLK.gif
-
Image:GoogleMichelangelo.gif
-
Image:GoogleLeapYear.gif
-
Image:GoogleJuly4.gif
-
Image:GoogleHalloween.gif
-
Image:GoogleFrankLloydWright.gif
-
Image:GoogleFlight.gif
-
Image:GoogleFathersDay.gif
-
Image:GoogleMCEscher.gif
-
Image:GoogleVote.gif
-
Image:GoogleEinstein.gif
-
Image:GoogleEdvardMunch.gif
- Image:GoogleEaster.jpg
- Image:GoogleEarthDay.gif
- Image:GoogleDNA.gif
- Image:GoogleDaVinci.gif
- Image:GoogleChildrensDay.gif
- Image:GoogleBraille.gif
- Image:GoogleCanadaDay.gif
The images above were uploaded by User:ANNAfoxlover.
- Image:ValentineGoogle07.gif -- uploaded by User:9591353082.
- Image:GoogleCWC07.gif -- uploaded by User:Thugchildz.
These images violate copyright, as stated on Google's official webpage regarding Holiday Doodles. link Google policy states: We have a variety of logos commemorating holidays and events. We've put them in this online museum for your amusement. Please do not use them elsewhere.
Furthermore, the use of such logos do not particularly serve to illustrate the company in question ( Google), as the official logo is used for the company's article, with a fair-use rationale. The images are readily accessible on Google's webpages (linked to on Google logo) and are disorganized and CV on Wikipedia. These images are not used on any current Wikipedia article. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 05:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; uploader probably does not have the right to release this screenshot into the public domain. — Bkell ( talk) 06:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Tittaliewinks ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, insufficient context to determine notability. —
Bkell (
talk)
06:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- This image was used in the now-deleted article Neal Hockett, which has been deleted twice [1] for non-notability. — Bkell ( talk) 06:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ryankelley ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Core desat 07:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Methodofimages32.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Methodofimages32.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Extensionimage2.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Physic sox ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, no explanation of notability, claim of GFDL-self is dubious. — Bkell ( talk) 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for advertising of a website. — — Ocatecir Talk 11:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for spam article. — — Ocatecir Talk 11:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image for spam article — — Ocatecir Talk 11:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
- UE- Abu badali ( talk) 11:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am speedily deleting this image because it clearly has a bad fair use tag. It is a photo montage where there is an "aura" from the source photograph of a Mickey Mouse toy which is superimposed on an out of focus bus with tall grass in front of the bus. The toy is holding a bag and a cell phone. This is low enough quality that no company would ever release it as a promotional photo. Jesse Viviano 07:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation Orphaned Unencyclopedic ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 11:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 11:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedia personal photo. User's only contribution. Iamunknown 12:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Rdstephens ( notify | contribs).
- Orphan, needs a lot of cropping if it's going to be used. — Bkell ( talk) 14:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- TIME magazine cover used only to illustrate the article of the person who is on the cover; see the seventh fair-use counterexample. — Bkell ( talk) 14:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk)
14:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am unable to notify the uploader, because her talk page is protected. — Bkell ( talk) 14:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Freedom skies ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality -- Selket Talk 15:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Freedom skies ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- Selket Talk 15:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Pandacakes ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,unenclyopedic,vandalism account
- - uploaded by Pandacakes ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,unenclyopedic,vandalism account
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Bigr Tex 15:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by ChibiTails ( notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Bigr Tex 15:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Bigr Tex 15:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- non-orphaned image. The uploader has changed the text under the licensing heading 5 times in 24 hours. Each change progressively made the image more unfree. Given this image is easily replaceable , this questionable licensed image should be deleted. Also, no source is specifically provided, but the original tag was PD-self. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 17:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User:Jellery ( notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic and being used to advance a political view point — Regan123 20:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
{hangon}
- - uploaded by Bigwickermonkey ( notify | contribs).
- Uploaded for use in now-deleted Walrus (band). Possible copyright violation. -- Slowking Man 20:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is no copyright violation here. Please leave this image alone. Thanks. -- Bigwickermonkey 16:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic orphan. ~ Bigr Tex 17:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bigwickermonkey ( notify | contribs).
- Uploaded for use in now-deleted Walrus (band). Possible copyright violation. -- Slowking Man 20:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is no copyright violation here. Please leave this image alone.-- Bigwickermonkey 16:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic orphan. ~ Bigr Tex 17:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
images by slowpokeiv
- Image:UWM Golda Meir Library Detail.jpg
- Image:UWM Golda Meir Library.jpg
- Image:UWM Mitchell Hall Fisheye.jpg
- Image:UWM Mitchell Hall.jpg
Orphan images. Miaers 23:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Typing error in name, obsoleted by Image:Dnepropetrovsk 9859s.JPG
-- Toddy1 23:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image, used to illustrate an article's section containing only external links. Doesn't seem to add significantly to the article- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image showing a given artist playing a keyboard. The image doesn't seem to add anything to the article that couldn't be done by a free image.- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I object. If both this and the image below are to be removed from article, there would be no images illustrating what Derek does for living - performing on stage. On the another note, this, and the image below, illustrate Derek's approach to playing (over-the-top, flashy movements, the attitude ...). It perfectly captures his character, and THAT cannot be replaced by text. Also, equivalent free image is not know to exist. --
RockyMM
17:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that text alone could illustrate "what Derek does for living", for instance, the text "performing on stage". Also, I see no mention to his "approach to playing" being "over-the-top flashy movements" not about his "attitude" in the article's current version (if someone plans to add it, please be sure to read Wikipedia:No Original Research and Wikipedia:Reliable sources first. The article has enough problems as it is now.). And I, for one, wasn't able to deduce from the image alone that his approach to playing was over-the-top, etc. I still believe that the image doesn't add anything to the article that couldn't be done by a free image -- Abu badali ( talk) 20:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image showing a given artist (the same from nomination above) playing a keyboard. It's use on the artist's bio or in the keyboard's brand's article doesn't seem to convey any significant information that couldn't be conveyed with text or a free image. -- Abu badali ( talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I object. Other than reasons I stated for the image above, this image illustrates product - Nord Lead 2. To my best knowledge, there is no equivalent free image. --
RockyMM
17:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Even if I would agree with the reasons stated on the image above, why would we use 2 unfree images for the same purpose? As for illustrating a product, couldn't that be done with free material alone? -- Abu badali ( talk) 20:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)