The image runs counter to the information here:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright#Images which cannot be "fair use" and the underlying principle of not using material copied from existing encyclopedias and encyclopedia-like works. The image was created and used in such a context where originally published: Batgirl Secret Files. —
J Greb 01:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible), unencyclopedic (appears to lack needed descriptive labels). I removed this image from
Money#Money_supply, where it had been added by the uploader with alt-text but no caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible), unencyclopedic (appears to lack needed descriptive labels). I removed this image from
Money#Monetary_policy, where it had been added by the uploader with alt-text but no caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible). This image was removed by the edit of "07:55, 18 July 2007 69.251.248.53 ... (Removed useless blurry microscopic image)" from
Money#Economic_characteristics, where it had been added by the uploader with no alt-text or caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete for all we know, this is a chart illustrating how many penguins die every day. Far too low res to ever be useful --
Lie! 08:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Image is meant to insult and demean the creator of
Ctrl+Alt+Del by showing frames where characters have a similar facial expression. In addition, only five of the characters are really recurring in the series, and showing them as "the cast" is a violation of
WP:UNDUE weight regarding their importance in the series and unencyclopedic as they are not even mentioned in the article. Image was previously at
Image:Ctrlaltfaces.png and was deleted. In addition, Wikipedia already has images that illustrate the major characters, at
List of Ctrl+Alt+Del characters, that do not insult the creator of the work (having been used officially on his site as an illustration of his work) —
Lie! 08:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
User uploaded and claimed they are the creator, although this is clearly several shots in animation of a copyrighted music video. — Ejfetters 09:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC).
Delete, the .gif itself is probably made by the user, but the text and the fact that it's a gif make it unsuitable for encyclopedic use. This belongs as someone's MSN avatar, not an encyclopedic illustration. --
Lie! 10:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep based only on encyclopedic reasons. I don't know how this image cannot be encyclopedic when it shows how the video illustrated Madonna's point!
Berserkerz Crit 12:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Claimed to be created by the user, but it is a photograph of an advertisement for a company. User is not the original photographer, and image is probably copyrighted by the company and/or the photographer — Ejfetters 09:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC).
Delete Copyvio, and not a good shot anyway --
Lie! 10:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Detail:
This image is straight from Uncyclopedia. Not only it is uncer Creative Commons non-commercial license. The image itself is a parody of DDR SuperNOVA PS2 homer version cover,which makes it fair use.
—
SYSS Mouse 13:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
IMAGE WAS DELETED BEFORE DISCUSSION WAS FINISHED. DELETION HAD NOTHING TO WITH THIS DISCUSSION.
Has nothing to do with the game's box/cover art. Fan created so it has no purpose on Wikipedia. —
Hornetman16(talk) 20:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - surely this doesn't fall under speedy deletion?!
Davnel03 21:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. You would think it would be speediable, but it's not, probably to give the uploader time to establish its authenticity (if possible). Just like with hoax articles. --But|
seriously|
folks 21:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Point is this one can't be authenticsizsed.--
Hornetman16(talk) 06:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
If you show me which category at
WP:CSD this satisfies, I'll happily delete it. Otherwise, it'll just be a few more days. See also
this section on hoaxes. --But|
seriously|
folks 07:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Ok, so an image which the creator has given no right to be on wikipedia, which is FAKE, which is clearly fake by it's own history, which illustrates nothing, and you don't think it should be removed ASAP? You should probably read over
WP:IAR and
WP:UCS, honestly, not removing the image at this point is stupid --Longing.... 07:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
You need to find more significant things to get worked up about. Nothing bad is going to happen to anybody if this image exists on Wikipedia for a few more days. Please knock off the namecalling and insulting edit summaries and find something more productive to do with your time. There are plenty more images that need tagging. It's not necessary for you to tag this one over and over. Its time will come. Thanks. --But|
seriously|
folks 08:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The image runs counter to the information here:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright#Images which cannot be "fair use" and the underlying principle of not using material copied from existing encyclopedias and encyclopedia-like works. The image was created and used in such a context where originally published: Batgirl Secret Files. —
J Greb 01:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible), unencyclopedic (appears to lack needed descriptive labels). I removed this image from
Money#Money_supply, where it had been added by the uploader with alt-text but no caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible), unencyclopedic (appears to lack needed descriptive labels). I removed this image from
Money#Monetary_policy, where it had been added by the uploader with alt-text but no caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, low quality (low resolution, illegible). This image was removed by the edit of "07:55, 18 July 2007 69.251.248.53 ... (Removed useless blurry microscopic image)" from
Money#Economic_characteristics, where it had been added by the uploader with no alt-text or caption, and lacked any relevant text in the article. —
Rich Janis 06:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete for all we know, this is a chart illustrating how many penguins die every day. Far too low res to ever be useful --
Lie! 08:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Image is meant to insult and demean the creator of
Ctrl+Alt+Del by showing frames where characters have a similar facial expression. In addition, only five of the characters are really recurring in the series, and showing them as "the cast" is a violation of
WP:UNDUE weight regarding their importance in the series and unencyclopedic as they are not even mentioned in the article. Image was previously at
Image:Ctrlaltfaces.png and was deleted. In addition, Wikipedia already has images that illustrate the major characters, at
List of Ctrl+Alt+Del characters, that do not insult the creator of the work (having been used officially on his site as an illustration of his work) —
Lie! 08:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
User uploaded and claimed they are the creator, although this is clearly several shots in animation of a copyrighted music video. — Ejfetters 09:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC).
Delete, the .gif itself is probably made by the user, but the text and the fact that it's a gif make it unsuitable for encyclopedic use. This belongs as someone's MSN avatar, not an encyclopedic illustration. --
Lie! 10:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep based only on encyclopedic reasons. I don't know how this image cannot be encyclopedic when it shows how the video illustrated Madonna's point!
Berserkerz Crit 12:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Claimed to be created by the user, but it is a photograph of an advertisement for a company. User is not the original photographer, and image is probably copyrighted by the company and/or the photographer — Ejfetters 09:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC).
Delete Copyvio, and not a good shot anyway --
Lie! 10:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Detail:
This image is straight from Uncyclopedia. Not only it is uncer Creative Commons non-commercial license. The image itself is a parody of DDR SuperNOVA PS2 homer version cover,which makes it fair use.
—
SYSS Mouse 13:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
IMAGE WAS DELETED BEFORE DISCUSSION WAS FINISHED. DELETION HAD NOTHING TO WITH THIS DISCUSSION.
Has nothing to do with the game's box/cover art. Fan created so it has no purpose on Wikipedia. —
Hornetman16(talk) 20:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - surely this doesn't fall under speedy deletion?!
Davnel03 21:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. You would think it would be speediable, but it's not, probably to give the uploader time to establish its authenticity (if possible). Just like with hoax articles. --But|
seriously|
folks 21:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Point is this one can't be authenticsizsed.--
Hornetman16(talk) 06:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
If you show me which category at
WP:CSD this satisfies, I'll happily delete it. Otherwise, it'll just be a few more days. See also
this section on hoaxes. --But|
seriously|
folks 07:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Ok, so an image which the creator has given no right to be on wikipedia, which is FAKE, which is clearly fake by it's own history, which illustrates nothing, and you don't think it should be removed ASAP? You should probably read over
WP:IAR and
WP:UCS, honestly, not removing the image at this point is stupid --Longing.... 07:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply
You need to find more significant things to get worked up about. Nothing bad is going to happen to anybody if this image exists on Wikipedia for a few more days. Please knock off the namecalling and insulting edit summaries and find something more productive to do with your time. There are plenty more images that need tagging. It's not necessary for you to tag this one over and over. Its time will come. Thanks. --But|
seriously|
folks 08:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)reply