The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: As noted, the image is now irreplaceable, and does add to the two articles where it is used. Superm401 - Talk 02:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Room-bab.jpg

Image:Room-bab.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wiki-uk ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. How does this image significantly add to the article? Rettetast ( talk) 16:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

As stated in the fair use criteria template on the image's page, the picture adds significantly because it is seen as the place where the religious movement of the Bab, Babism, was started, and is thus significant to the history of the religion. Since the whole building was destroyed by the Iranian authorities, no free alternative can be found. Regards, -- Jeff3000 ( talk) 18:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was keep, but with the logo removed. — Edokter • Talk • 17:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:10dr19.jpg

Image:10dr19.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aquanostra9 ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 and #3 violation. photoshopped collection of image of the different characters. There are images in the articles about the specific character, and this is not needed. Rettetast ( talk) 16:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
• Keep - image illustrates the fact the doctor has been played by multiple actors and the fact that the doctors regenerations can be drastically different. Million_Moments ( talk) 20:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep - While I'm not a fan of manipulated images, grid sequences are close to cropping. As the file stands, it is a grouping of 11 distinct images where no attempt has been made to blend, combine, add, remove, or modify elements. That being said, the logo shouldn't be there unless this is a scan of a poster or the like released or licensed by the BBC. - J Greb ( talk) 00:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I see the point about removing the logo, but otherwise the picture seems justified in the articles in which it's used, given the commentary in both about the multiple actors to play the role. -- Brian Olsen ( talk) 02:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep - There are no other images of the Doctor character in either article, thought the image should be edited to remove the logo.

• keep, but reduce usage, the appearence is iconic, no need to use in Doctor who, in the article about the Doctor, other images, such as Tom Baker should be removed per #1 Fasach Nua ( talk) 18:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I agree with the usage in Doctor Who#The Doctor being overkill. The section is to short (rightly so) for info on all ten which would support the use of this image. Since the section would become a battleground if the image were to be limited to one Doctor, better to remove the image from that article.
    The use of Image:Bakert.jpg in Doctor (Doctor Who)#Changing fashions is a bit thornier since, supposedly, the use is to illustrate costuming changes, not the incarnation itself. - J Greb ( talk) 00:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply
    • Perhaps the montage image could be modified to contain the image Image:Bakert.jpg in place of the current 4th doctor, minimal usage would suggest that if an image was able to illustrate the fashon and the incarnation, then it should be used Fasach Nua ( talk) 00:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply
      • Six of one... The montage fills the bill of supporting "Changing fashions" as is. General use though, as I've seen it, is that the 'box image is viewed as an example of the character, not necessarily other points in the articles. To a degree this is an issue that needs to be addressed on the talk page of the Doctor article since the common sense answer would to reference the infobox images in that section. It becomes thorny since "minimal usage" is a little fluid and the image removal may be a hot button issue with the editors working on and watching the article. - J Greb ( talk) 01:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply
        • I think this demonstrates the problems of montages,in the article Doctor (Doctor Who) either the top right corner portion of this is removed or the image bakert.jpg is removed, seperate images give a greater flexibility, the same effect could be given with a table in a template. The fair use rationale does not support the use of the logo, and as such is in breach of copyright, therefore I would change my opinion to deletion Fasach Nua ( talk) 01:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Keep - I can't see how it fails #8 - I think this qualifies as significant, as it shows the reader a quick summary of each of the ten different doctors. As for 3, I don't think this gives an unnecessary amount of images on either of the two pages. Stuart DD _{contributions} 20:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply

• Keep, but remove the logo, the image is fine. All ten are used to stop edit-warring over which Doctor should be there (there were disputes on Talk:Sontaran and Talk:Master (Doctor Who) over which of two images should be there). The Doctor's process of regeneration and having different faces is discussed quite extensively - hell, half of the article is about it. I agree though, that the logo is unneeded. Will ^{( talk)} 22:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep, remove the logo per above. Rob T Firefly ( talk) 17:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep, remove the logo. The image is useful as it shows all the official incarnations of the character in the show. DonQuixote ( talk) 16:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was Delete. While technically not a "copyright violation", it does fail significance ( WP:NFCC#8) as a key element to the plot. — Edokter • Talk • 17:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:2.0.Christmas Invasion.jpg

Image:2.0.Christmas Invasion.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smeggles ( notify | contribs).

• Copyright violation - This image is to "To illustrate a key moment - The Tenth Doctor having chosen his new costume", this is not a key point of the story (NFC #1), and even if it was, this image does not represent it very well(NFC #8) Fasach Nua ( talk) 17:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delete - agree that it is not a key plot point, and images of the tenth doctor on relavent article show information on his clothing choice. Million_Moments ( talk) 16:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• week delete - Not really a key part of the plot and would be better if replaced by an image more central to the plot. Stuart DD _{contributions} 10:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image has already been deleted, and is now on Commons. Superm401 - Talk 02:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:UserCitikiwi.jpg

Image:UserCitikiwi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Citikiwi ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Commons showing through. - Nv8200p talk 22:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was keep. — Edokter • Talk • 17:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg

Image:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Why is it even nominated?--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep I'm also confused as to why it was nominated. Mistake by the Bot? Million_Moments ( talk) 16:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Incomplete nomination, with no reason. Image has legitimate fair use rationale. Superm401 - Talk 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Werner Erhard Larry King Live.jpg

Image:Werner Erhard Larry King Live.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smee ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Korean pottery images kept, as with Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 December 24 (section)#Image:Drinking_Mug.jpg. – Quadell ^{( talk) ( random)} 02:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:White Yi Bottle 1.jpg

Image:White Yi Bottle 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:White Yi Bottle with Decoration 1.jpg

Image:White Yi Bottle with Decoration 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

No reason provided, possibly duplicate nomination. — Edokter • Talk • 17:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Wyszyński.jpg

Image:Wyszyński.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 172 ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Korean pottery images kept, as with Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 December 24#Image:Drinking_Mug.jpg. – Quadell ^{( talk) ( random)} 02:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Bowl 18th Century.jpg

Image:Yi Bowl 18th Century.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Bowl 17th Century 2.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Bowl 17th Century 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Bowl 2.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Bowl 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Dish 13th 14th Century 3.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Dish 13th 14th Century 3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Dish 13th 14th Century.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Low Dish 13th 14th Century.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Rice Cake Stamps.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Rice Cake Stamps.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Stoneware Offering Plate.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Stoneware Offering Plate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Stoneware Spindles.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Stoneware Spindles.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Two Offering Bowls.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Two Offering Bowls.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Dynasty Vase 13th 14th Century.jpg

Image:Yi Dynasty Vase 13th 14th Century.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Ginger Jar.jpg

Image:Yi Ginger Jar.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Jar.jpg

Image:Yi Jar.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Large Rice Bowl.jpg

Image:Yi Large Rice Bowl.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Porcelain Waterdroppers.jpg

Image:Yi Porcelain Waterdroppers.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Pottery Bowl 2.jpg

Image:Yi Pottery Bowl 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Rice Bowl.jpg

Image:Yi Rice Bowl.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Vase 15th 16th Century.jpg

Image:Yi Vase 15th 16th Century.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Vase 18th Century.jpg

Image:Yi Vase 18th Century.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Yi Vase 3a.jpg

Image:Yi Vase 3a.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MVCOL ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was keep. — Edokter • Talk • 17:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Zupan.jpg

Image:Zupan.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Uppitycrip ( notify | contribs).

• Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot ( talk) 18:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
• Keep - free content image used to illustrate an article on the person in question. Million_Moments ( talk) 20:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Images used in McDonald's Deluxe line article

Please take the time to review the article as a whole, these images are not decorating the article but are used to show an example of the product and the logo used in its advertising. The usage is proper and invalidates the claim of WP:NFCC#8 violations. There was an formatting error on the page which did not show the included caption of the images which I have now corrected, and the images are now shown in their proper context. - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 01:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)) reply

Image:McDs_fish_deluxe.png

Image:McDs_fish_deluxe.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerem43 ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. Image of a hamburger used to decorate the article. Not important for the understanding of the subject. Rettetast ( talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

• Keep - It is not used as decoration, but to show an example of the product. The only available picture was from an old advertisement. It has a valid FUR rationale and is properly used in context. - Jeremy - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 23:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
• Delete per nom. Used in breach of WP:NFCC#8 and possibly WP:NFCC#1. Wikipedia strongly eschews the use of non-free images for decorative purposes, preferring those that provide additional essential information. Chris.B ( talk) 13:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:McDs_crispy_chicken_deluxe.png

Image:McDs_crispy_chicken_deluxe.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerem43 ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. Image of a hamburger used to decorate the article. Not important for the understanding of the subject. Rettetast ( talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

• Keep - It is not used as decoration, but to show an example of the product. The only available picture was from an old advertisement. It has a valid FUR rationale and is properly used in context. - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 23:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
• Delete per nom. Used in breach of WP:NFCC#8 and possibly WP:NFCC#1. Wikipedia strongly eschews the use of non-free images for decorative purposes, preferring those that provide additional essential information. Chris.B ( talk) 13:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:McDs_grilled_chicken_deluxe.png

Image:McDs_grilled_chicken_deluxe.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerem43 ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. Image of a hamburger used to decorate the article. Not important for the understanding of the subject. Rettetast ( talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

• Keep - It is not used as decoration, but to show an example of the product. The only available picture was from an old advertisement. It has a valid FUR rationale and is properly used in context. - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 23:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
• Delete per nom. Used in breach of WP:NFCC#8 and possibly WP:NFCC#1. Wikipedia strongly eschews the use of non-free images for decorative purposes, preferring those that provide additional essential information. Chris.B ( talk) 13:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:McDs_arch_deluxe.png

Image:McDs_arch_deluxe.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jerem43 ( notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. Image of a hamburger used to decorate the article. Not important for the understanding of the subject. Rettetast ( talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

• Keep - It is not used as decoration, but to show an example of the product. The only available picture was from an old advertisement. It has a valid FUR rationale and is properly used in context. - Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 23:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
• Delete per nom. Used in breach of WP:NFCC#8 and possibly WP:NFCC#1. Wikipedia strongly eschews the use of non-free images for decorative purposes, preferring those that provide additional essential information. Chris.B ( talk) 13:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Images deleted. Images are not necessary to the understanding of the article. - Nv8200p talk 04:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.