Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned.
Comment: uploader's user name suggests that it was uploaded by photo subject. Assuming that he paid to get the photo taken, he would be free to release PD.
Kelvinc (
talk) 08:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete: uploader is
not photo subject, and unlikely to have right to release photo to PD.
Kelvinc (
talk) 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)reply
This image was orphaned as a result of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Fine Day!, which caused the deletion of its parent article. It seems unencyclopedic to the extent that it is difficult to imagine another article that could use the image.
Darkspots (
talk) 01:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality, likely copyvio (looks like it was just cropped from a larger image) WarpstarRider 14:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality, likely copyvio (looks like it was just cropped from a larger image) WarpstarRider 14:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Likely Copyright violation. Can't find the exact photo, but photos at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/plaid/ have not had any rights released. Uploader has history of using images with non-free licenses. --
RG2 16:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Likely Copyright violation. Can't find the exact photo, but photos at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/17723729@N00/ have not had any rights released. Uploader has history of using images with non-free licenses. --
RG2 16:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose deletion...lemme see who removed the image from the article first and get it reinserted.
Kransky (
talk) 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)reply
You removed the image yourself in
this edit. --
RG2 01:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdraw, per discussion. --
RG2 21:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Uploader removed map from article
here. Outdated? I'm not sure myself. --
RG2 16:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdraw, per discussion. --
RG2 21:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Uploader removed map from article
here. Outdated? I'm not sure myself. --
RG2 16:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned.
Comment: uploader's user name suggests that it was uploaded by photo subject. Assuming that he paid to get the photo taken, he would be free to release PD.
Kelvinc (
talk) 08:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete: uploader is
not photo subject, and unlikely to have right to release photo to PD.
Kelvinc (
talk) 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)reply
This image was orphaned as a result of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Fine Day!, which caused the deletion of its parent article. It seems unencyclopedic to the extent that it is difficult to imagine another article that could use the image.
Darkspots (
talk) 01:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality, likely copyvio (looks like it was just cropped from a larger image) WarpstarRider 14:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality, likely copyvio (looks like it was just cropped from a larger image) WarpstarRider 14:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Likely Copyright violation. Can't find the exact photo, but photos at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/plaid/ have not had any rights released. Uploader has history of using images with non-free licenses. --
RG2 16:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Likely Copyright violation. Can't find the exact photo, but photos at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/17723729@N00/ have not had any rights released. Uploader has history of using images with non-free licenses. --
RG2 16:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose deletion...lemme see who removed the image from the article first and get it reinserted.
Kransky (
talk) 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)reply
You removed the image yourself in
this edit. --
RG2 01:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdraw, per discussion. --
RG2 21:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Uploader removed map from article
here. Outdated? I'm not sure myself. --
RG2 16:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdraw, per discussion. --
RG2 21:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Uploader removed map from article
here. Outdated? I'm not sure myself. --
RG2 16:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
