![]() ![]() | This page, part of the
Graphics Lab Wikiproject, is an
archive of requests for 2020. Please do not edit the contents of this page. You can submit new requests here. |
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 12:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
{{
resolved}}
{{ resolved}}
@
Dank: If you want to change something, please give me your comments. Done
PawełMM (
talk) 06:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Dank: Done as requested. PawełMM ( talk) 20:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 14:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 19:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 05:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 08:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 20:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Please improve the quality of this image. Although the image claims to be high-resolution (2204x4202), it is extremely blurry. Please replace with a genuinely high-resolution version.
Another problem is that the original painting has become quite dark and faded over time. Someone with good oil-painting knowledge and photorealistic remastering skills will be needed to restore the scan to make it visible as the artist intended.
I do not know where a high quality image can be found. Because the artist died in 1934, it should be free of copyright issues. But, obtaining the image may be more difficult.
A much smaller (637x1200), but slightly more detailed image, can be downloaded from the museum where the artwork is held: https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/lilith-65854/view_as/grid/search/keyword:lilith/page/1 . While improved -- notice the snake's eye above her breast -- the quality of that scan is not stellar and probably not worth using. It may be possible to ask the museum for a higher quality scan, but given that the version they allow you to download comes with a "NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY" license (is that even legal?), I'm not sure they would be open to putting it out to the world via wikipedia.
There are several companies online selling higher resolution versions of the image, either as a stock photo or printed on yoga mats, coffee mugs, and tapestries. However, it is possible they made "significant" alterations to the image by restoring the colours. I'm not sure how copyright law works when a company is simply undoing the effects of aging rather than expressing an artistic intent. I'm guessing that means their images cannot be legally used even if they depict exactly what John Collier painted 130 years ago.
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 03:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | This page, part of the
Graphics Lab Wikiproject, is an
archive of requests for 2020. Please do not edit the contents of this page. You can submit new requests here. |
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 12:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
{{
resolved}}
{{ resolved}}
@
Dank: If you want to change something, please give me your comments. Done
PawełMM (
talk) 06:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Dank: Done as requested. PawełMM ( talk) 20:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 14:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 19:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 05:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 08:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 20:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Please improve the quality of this image. Although the image claims to be high-resolution (2204x4202), it is extremely blurry. Please replace with a genuinely high-resolution version.
Another problem is that the original painting has become quite dark and faded over time. Someone with good oil-painting knowledge and photorealistic remastering skills will be needed to restore the scan to make it visible as the artist intended.
I do not know where a high quality image can be found. Because the artist died in 1934, it should be free of copyright issues. But, obtaining the image may be more difficult.
A much smaller (637x1200), but slightly more detailed image, can be downloaded from the museum where the artwork is held: https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/lilith-65854/view_as/grid/search/keyword:lilith/page/1 . While improved -- notice the snake's eye above her breast -- the quality of that scan is not stellar and probably not worth using. It may be possible to ask the museum for a higher quality scan, but given that the version they allow you to download comes with a "NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY" license (is that even legal?), I'm not sure they would be open to putting it out to the world via wikipedia.
There are several companies online selling higher resolution versions of the image, either as a stock photo or printed on yoga mats, coffee mugs, and tapestries. However, it is possible they made "significant" alterations to the image by restoring the colours. I'm not sure how copyright law works when a company is simply undoing the effects of aging rather than expressing an artistic intent. I'm guessing that means their images cannot be legally used even if they depict exactly what John Collier painted 130 years ago.
{{ resolved}}
Done
PawełMM (
talk) 03:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)