This page, part of the Graphics Lab Wikiproject, is an
archive of requests for 2020.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. You can submit new requests here.
Please stitch, but without a noticeable curve if possible. The black pedestal at the bottom should be straight, retouch ceiling to make uniform white/grey, it should essentially appear like in this image
[1]. Thank you. --
Gryffindor (
talk)
16:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Discussion
@
Gryffindor: In my opinion, the connection can not be made correct because the next photos were taken from different places. A correct connection would be possible if a tripod with a movable head was used.
PawełMM (
talk)
07:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I kindly request for the esteemed graphists to sharpen and make me more clear the two public domain portraits of Davis from 1919 and 1923, and to the furthest extent allowable, the fair use portrait from 1968. Please let me know if you have any questions for me in the meantime, or require further information. The original PDF files for the two PD portraits are linked on the portraits' respective Wikimedia Commons pages. --
West Virginian (talk)15:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I would like to humbly request for the graphists to please improve the quality of this fair use image, as much as is appropriate. I really appreciate you taking the time to improve the clarity of Mrs. Davis' portrait. --
West Virginian (talk)23:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hope I'm in the right place. I'm so bad at image cropping, and I need the first image to be cropped so that it could be used as a portrait for the article (one of the requests at FAC), without looking blurry if possible. The second one is also quite wide and if something could be done with it, I'd grateful. --
Shahid • Talk2me17:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure it's possible to remove the watermarks, but please do if you can. Anyway, if you can't maybe you could crop it just enough for a portrait. Thanks, --
Shahid • Talk2me23:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Emperor of Emperors: The lines you are talking about are like the original. Probably in this way the author ran the pen and this caused gaps in the line. I think it should be left as it is. Retouch would not look natural.
PawełMM (
talk)
07:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you. Gratefully. Can you please make the lines a bit smoother as they are in the original signature? And connect the third letter to the fourth as well?
Emperor of Emperors (
talk)
12:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Emperor of Emperors: The letters have been combined. Improving the thickness of the line would require tedious manual retouching. The original background is very dark and has a weak contrast, making it difficult to extract thin signature lines.
PawełMM (
talk)
04:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I would like to kindly request for the graphists to improve the overall quality of this image, which was taken from
this source. I appreciate all your assistance, and please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information in the meantime. --
West Virginian (talk)20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
PawełMM, thank you so much for loading a better resolution and for the balancing and other edits. The new photograph looks amazing, and I appreciate you taking the time to make these changes for improvement! Thanks again! --
West Virginian (talk)13:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi, could you give this a quick rotation, and then crop out much of the sky and guardrail? I can crop it myself, but no point in doing that until it's been properly rotated. Thanks!
Nyttend (
talk)
14:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Oh, no, sorry. I think the image isn't very straight, as in if you rotated it a few degrees clockwise it would be a better image. If I'm wrong on that, just tell me "you're wrong" and I'll be satisfied :-)
Nyttend (
talk)
14:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Nyttend: I know what you mean; perhaps the photographer had the ol' Sunday morning wobbles :)
is this any better? I took the liberty of cropping the truck too, but perhaps you'd prefer that in?
——SN5412914:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I strongly doubt it — I took the picture on Saturday :-) Yes, the rotation, the vertical crop, and the horizontal crop are all good. Would you mind uploading it on top of the original image, instead of having it as a separate file?
Nyttend (
talk)
15:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
There appears to be some white space on the left-hand side of the photograph. I'm not sure if (a) it's just a matter of cropping it, (b) the image is actually slightly askew and in need of tilting, or (c) there's not anything that can practically be done here.
207.161.86.162 (
talk)
22:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
This page, part of the Graphics Lab Wikiproject, is an
archive of requests for 2020.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. You can submit new requests here.
Please stitch, but without a noticeable curve if possible. The black pedestal at the bottom should be straight, retouch ceiling to make uniform white/grey, it should essentially appear like in this image
[1]. Thank you. --
Gryffindor (
talk)
16:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Discussion
@
Gryffindor: In my opinion, the connection can not be made correct because the next photos were taken from different places. A correct connection would be possible if a tripod with a movable head was used.
PawełMM (
talk)
07:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I kindly request for the esteemed graphists to sharpen and make me more clear the two public domain portraits of Davis from 1919 and 1923, and to the furthest extent allowable, the fair use portrait from 1968. Please let me know if you have any questions for me in the meantime, or require further information. The original PDF files for the two PD portraits are linked on the portraits' respective Wikimedia Commons pages. --
West Virginian (talk)15:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I would like to humbly request for the graphists to please improve the quality of this fair use image, as much as is appropriate. I really appreciate you taking the time to improve the clarity of Mrs. Davis' portrait. --
West Virginian (talk)23:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Hope I'm in the right place. I'm so bad at image cropping, and I need the first image to be cropped so that it could be used as a portrait for the article (one of the requests at FAC), without looking blurry if possible. The second one is also quite wide and if something could be done with it, I'd grateful. --
Shahid • Talk2me17:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure it's possible to remove the watermarks, but please do if you can. Anyway, if you can't maybe you could crop it just enough for a portrait. Thanks, --
Shahid • Talk2me23:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Emperor of Emperors: The lines you are talking about are like the original. Probably in this way the author ran the pen and this caused gaps in the line. I think it should be left as it is. Retouch would not look natural.
PawełMM (
talk)
07:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you. Gratefully. Can you please make the lines a bit smoother as they are in the original signature? And connect the third letter to the fourth as well?
Emperor of Emperors (
talk)
12:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Emperor of Emperors: The letters have been combined. Improving the thickness of the line would require tedious manual retouching. The original background is very dark and has a weak contrast, making it difficult to extract thin signature lines.
PawełMM (
talk)
04:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I would like to kindly request for the graphists to improve the overall quality of this image, which was taken from
this source. I appreciate all your assistance, and please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information in the meantime. --
West Virginian (talk)20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
PawełMM, thank you so much for loading a better resolution and for the balancing and other edits. The new photograph looks amazing, and I appreciate you taking the time to make these changes for improvement! Thanks again! --
West Virginian (talk)13:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi, could you give this a quick rotation, and then crop out much of the sky and guardrail? I can crop it myself, but no point in doing that until it's been properly rotated. Thanks!
Nyttend (
talk)
14:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Oh, no, sorry. I think the image isn't very straight, as in if you rotated it a few degrees clockwise it would be a better image. If I'm wrong on that, just tell me "you're wrong" and I'll be satisfied :-)
Nyttend (
talk)
14:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Nyttend: I know what you mean; perhaps the photographer had the ol' Sunday morning wobbles :)
is this any better? I took the liberty of cropping the truck too, but perhaps you'd prefer that in?
——SN5412914:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I strongly doubt it — I took the picture on Saturday :-) Yes, the rotation, the vertical crop, and the horizontal crop are all good. Would you mind uploading it on top of the original image, instead of having it as a separate file?
Nyttend (
talk)
15:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
There appears to be some white space on the left-hand side of the photograph. I'm not sure if (a) it's just a matter of cropping it, (b) the image is actually slightly askew and in need of tilting, or (c) there's not anything that can practically be done here.
207.161.86.162 (
talk)
22:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply