The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted.
Hog Farm
Talk
18:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The page no longer meets Good Article criteria in my opinion, reception section in particular is almost empty besides the reviews of the game being listed in a box. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 06:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Just because the reception section is almost empty that means it is no longer a good article? SMBMovieFan ( talk) 00:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it does need some prose explaining how the series has been received, year on year. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 19:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delist No longer is correct. The scope is much larger now and content failed to keep up. Covering Smackdown through WWE 2K in one article will need a lot more effort. Even if Smackdown had its own article, 4 games are missing since the former main editor ceased contributing after WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008. « Ryūkotsusei » 21:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delist I'm going to have to agree that this has fallen below standard. Of course, this is always temporary, and can be fixed with some work. Shooterwalker ( talk) 18:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted.
Hog Farm
Talk
18:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The page no longer meets Good Article criteria in my opinion, reception section in particular is almost empty besides the reviews of the game being listed in a box. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 06:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Just because the reception section is almost empty that means it is no longer a good article? SMBMovieFan ( talk) 00:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it does need some prose explaining how the series has been received, year on year. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 19:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delist No longer is correct. The scope is much larger now and content failed to keep up. Covering Smackdown through WWE 2K in one article will need a lot more effort. Even if Smackdown had its own article, 4 games are missing since the former main editor ceased contributing after WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008. « Ryūkotsusei » 21:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delist I'm going to have to agree that this has fallen below standard. Of course, this is always temporary, and can be fixed with some work. Shooterwalker ( talk) 18:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)