- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch •
- Result: Closed for renomination at WP:GAN. PeterSymonds | talk 21:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The article has many cleanup and fact tags. And needs many references to be cited. David Pro ( talk) 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any cleanup or fact tags at all. All [citation needed] tags have been cited during the last week or so. I think it deserves to be a Good Article. Zebbe ( talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The reviewed version of the article had cleanup and fact tags tags. The reviewer correctly quick-failed the article. Since then the article's editors have done a great job addressing concerns. In these situations the best course of action is to re-nominate the article at GAN. Majoreditor ( talk) 17:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Concur with Majoreditor (also see my comment on Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Joker (comics)/1 below). EyeSerene TALK 12:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch •
- Result: Closed for renomination at WP:GAN. PeterSymonds | talk 21:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The article has many cleanup and fact tags. And needs many references to be cited. David Pro ( talk) 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any cleanup or fact tags at all. All [citation needed] tags have been cited during the last week or so. I think it deserves to be a Good Article. Zebbe ( talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The reviewed version of the article had cleanup and fact tags tags. The reviewer correctly quick-failed the article. Since then the article's editors have done a great job addressing concerns. In these situations the best course of action is to re-nominate the article at GAN. Majoreditor ( talk) 17:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Concur with Majoreditor (also see my comment on Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Joker (comics)/1 below). EyeSerene TALK 12:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)