The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: Kept The article was updated and no new concerns were raisedAIRcorn(talk) 02:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I cannot see how a completely outdated biography can still have Good Article status. It seems that it has not been updated for nearly four years! --
RJFF (
talk) 15:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Delist. Article is outdated and as it isn't updated regularly there appears little chance it will be.
Szzuk (
talk) 18:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)reply
There doesn't appear to be much else to say. The end of the article notes that he was retired after the coup. Since then, the sources say that he's still retired. It appears that a politician accused him of plotting a coup, but that appears to have been a hoax. We can't really "update" an article if nothing's changed.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 06:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)reply
I think the main problem is the lead section: it suggests that he still holds these positions, what he AFAIK does not. --
RJFF (
talk) 15:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)reply
And you have not boldly fixed this because... why, exactly?
WP:Be bold applies to all of our editors, including you.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 00:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The lead seems to be updated to 2010 now. Are there any other updating concerns or general GA concerns?
AIRcorn(talk) 06:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply
It still doesn't look great but I'll switch to neutral.
Szzuk (
talk) 20:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: Kept The article was updated and no new concerns were raisedAIRcorn(talk) 02:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I cannot see how a completely outdated biography can still have Good Article status. It seems that it has not been updated for nearly four years! --
RJFF (
talk) 15:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Delist. Article is outdated and as it isn't updated regularly there appears little chance it will be.
Szzuk (
talk) 18:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)reply
There doesn't appear to be much else to say. The end of the article notes that he was retired after the coup. Since then, the sources say that he's still retired. It appears that a politician accused him of plotting a coup, but that appears to have been a hoax. We can't really "update" an article if nothing's changed.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 06:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)reply
I think the main problem is the lead section: it suggests that he still holds these positions, what he AFAIK does not. --
RJFF (
talk) 15:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)reply
And you have not boldly fixed this because... why, exactly?
WP:Be bold applies to all of our editors, including you.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 00:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The lead seems to be updated to 2010 now. Are there any other updating concerns or general GA concerns?
AIRcorn(talk) 06:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply
It still doesn't look great but I'll switch to neutral.
Szzuk (
talk) 20:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.