Large sections of this article are severely lacking in sources, meaning that it fails GA criteria 2: Verifiable with no original research. If this article were being nominated right now for a GA review, I believe it would be quick failed for severely lacking in sources. Was GA nominated in 2007, and the unsourced content was added later, but right now it's nowhere near acceptable as a GA. For example:
All in all, this doesn't meet the standards of verified text required for GA, as there's far too much original research. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 22:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Large sections of this article are severely lacking in sources, meaning that it fails GA criteria 2: Verifiable with no original research. If this article were being nominated right now for a GA review, I believe it would be quick failed for severely lacking in sources. Was GA nominated in 2007, and the unsourced content was added later, but right now it's nowhere near acceptable as a GA. For example:
All in all, this doesn't meet the standards of verified text required for GA, as there's far too much original research. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 22:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)