Comment. The article actually contains lots of case citations, which, in my opinion, enough for the jurisprudence section. To solve the problem with some {{cn}} tags, it is necessary to convert some refs in Additional reading section into inline citations.
Ruslik (
talk)
18:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep I think this now is pretty much up to standard. I am not sure whether law articles should have the {{ussc}} template inside <Ref></ref> tags. If anyone else has an opinion on this matter that would be useful. I am pleased to see everything tagged with the template. Now, everything is
verifyable for the reader with
WP:RSs.--
TonyTheTiger (
t/
c/
bio/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:LOTM)
15:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. The article actually contains lots of case citations, which, in my opinion, enough for the jurisprudence section. To solve the problem with some {{cn}} tags, it is necessary to convert some refs in Additional reading section into inline citations.
Ruslik (
talk)
18:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep I think this now is pretty much up to standard. I am not sure whether law articles should have the {{ussc}} template inside <Ref></ref> tags. If anyone else has an opinion on this matter that would be useful. I am pleased to see everything tagged with the template. Now, everything is
verifyable for the reader with
WP:RSs.--
TonyTheTiger (
t/
c/
bio/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:LOTM)
15:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)reply