Jamie Stuart
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. Deadlinks were fixed and no further issues were specifically noted.
Wizardman
Operation Big Bear
02:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I dont think this article meets the criteria for GA anymore. It lacks infomation fot the length of time he has been playing football and it also lacks references.– Liam Taylor– 13:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you be a little more specific? I can't see any lack of references and the article clearly illustrates his playing history.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have invited the original nominator to comment here.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- More in the early stage of his career, 46+ appearences for
Millwall is covered by 3 lines and only a couple of refs.–
Liam
Taylor–
16:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't found much on-line about his spell at Millwall. Sometimes the coverage just isn' there. Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- More in the early stage of his career, 46+ appearences for
Millwall is covered by 3 lines and only a couple of refs.–
Liam
Taylor–
16:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have invited the original nominator to comment here.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. There are more references than I was expecting and nothing wrong with the article. I googled for info on his Millwall career, there just isn't much. Szzuk ( talk) 10:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Well as Iv'e been told before, sometimes there just isn't enough coverage out there to make GA (sometimes it just isn't possible, like I found out trying to get Matty Barlow to GA). Liam Taylor 17:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delist Mostly because of the numerous dead links, but there is also a lack of breadth. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 01:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Dead links are sorted. One remains, but I found another source that backs up the statement so it could easily be removed if it still presents a problem. It should be noted that dead links are not a reason for denying GA status anymore, but most can be fixed relatively easily. The breadth seems fine to me for a good article on a football player. AIRcorn (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just a reminder that the WP:Good article criteria do not require functional URLs in citations. Any dead ref repair should be done in accordance with WP:DEADREF, which does not recommend simply removing them. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 17:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- I used the wayback machine for most, found a couple of replacement ones or duplicated refs hosted at other websites and only removed the ones that had another ref already supporting the claim, [1] which is in accordance with WP:DEADREF. BTW I think this article should be kept as no one has been able to find the information that is claimed to be missing. Also WP:GACN sugggests that comprehensive coverage is not required, as long as the major aspects are "addressed". AIRcorn (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to close this but the deadlinks actually have not been addressed; I checked and there are multiple ones. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Jamie Stuart
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. Deadlinks were fixed and no further issues were specifically noted.
Wizardman
Operation Big Bear
02:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I dont think this article meets the criteria for GA anymore. It lacks infomation fot the length of time he has been playing football and it also lacks references.– Liam Taylor– 13:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you be a little more specific? I can't see any lack of references and the article clearly illustrates his playing history.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have invited the original nominator to comment here.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- More in the early stage of his career, 46+ appearences for
Millwall is covered by 3 lines and only a couple of refs.–
Liam
Taylor–
16:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't found much on-line about his spell at Millwall. Sometimes the coverage just isn' there. Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- More in the early stage of his career, 46+ appearences for
Millwall is covered by 3 lines and only a couple of refs.–
Liam
Taylor–
16:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have invited the original nominator to comment here.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
15:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. There are more references than I was expecting and nothing wrong with the article. I googled for info on his Millwall career, there just isn't much. Szzuk ( talk) 10:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Well as Iv'e been told before, sometimes there just isn't enough coverage out there to make GA (sometimes it just isn't possible, like I found out trying to get Matty Barlow to GA). Liam Taylor 17:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delist Mostly because of the numerous dead links, but there is also a lack of breadth. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 01:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Dead links are sorted. One remains, but I found another source that backs up the statement so it could easily be removed if it still presents a problem. It should be noted that dead links are not a reason for denying GA status anymore, but most can be fixed relatively easily. The breadth seems fine to me for a good article on a football player. AIRcorn (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just a reminder that the WP:Good article criteria do not require functional URLs in citations. Any dead ref repair should be done in accordance with WP:DEADREF, which does not recommend simply removing them. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 17:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- I used the wayback machine for most, found a couple of replacement ones or duplicated refs hosted at other websites and only removed the ones that had another ref already supporting the claim, [1] which is in accordance with WP:DEADREF. BTW I think this article should be kept as no one has been able to find the information that is claimed to be missing. Also WP:GACN sugggests that comprehensive coverage is not required, as long as the major aspects are "addressed". AIRcorn (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to close this but the deadlinks actually have not been addressed; I checked and there are multiple ones. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)