- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Consensus is for delisting
DragonZero (
Talk ·
Contribs)
11:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Here you can see that when this article became a GA, it then also did not fulfill the criteria. Currently the article is very underdetailed, nearly only 1 or 2 sentences describing each season of Nottingham Forest. The career statistics section is unreferenced in addition to some unreferenced sentences in the text. The article does not say anything about his style of play or personal life indicating it is not broad in coverage. So I am asking for a reassessment of this article. RRD13 ( talk) 04:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delist – this article was awarded GA with a sixteen word "review" in 2007, at which time it was only supported by Soccerbase, BBC and primary club sources. Anyway, the current article contains POV in the lead, OR in the first section, the prose is very sub-standard in the largest section, including being out of date and unreferenced, all of which point to this article being delisted. C 679 21:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Consensus is for delisting
DragonZero (
Talk ·
Contribs)
11:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Here you can see that when this article became a GA, it then also did not fulfill the criteria. Currently the article is very underdetailed, nearly only 1 or 2 sentences describing each season of Nottingham Forest. The career statistics section is unreferenced in addition to some unreferenced sentences in the text. The article does not say anything about his style of play or personal life indicating it is not broad in coverage. So I am asking for a reassessment of this article. RRD13 ( talk) 04:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delist – this article was awarded GA with a sixteen word "review" in 2007, at which time it was only supported by Soccerbase, BBC and primary club sources. Anyway, the current article contains POV in the lead, OR in the first section, the prose is very sub-standard in the largest section, including being out of date and unreferenced, all of which point to this article being delisted. C 679 21:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)