Call of Duty 2
- Result: Archived as a stale discussion. No evidence of anyone wishing to change its GA status yet. -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 21:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
As I see it, fails the 'broad in coverage aspect', giving only a brief bit about anything besides gameplay and plot. The lead reflects this lack of information- it talks about mobile phone versions, but I haven't seen anything in the article about it. David Fuchs ( talk) 01:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Woah, I guess I was biased in looking at it when I wrote it...anyways, I'll go add to the reception (etc.) sections now. Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Gameplay synopsis is a TAD long, but not much, and there is enough on reception and press coverage that I don't see anything worth delisting over... -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 06:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The refs are inconsistent with formatting - accessed 19 July 2007 and Retrieved on November 16, 2007. A lot of references are missing publisher and dates. With the IGN references say which page it is because all the refs look the same. M3tal H3ad ( talk) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Only problem I see is with the inconsistent citations. Drewcifer ( talk) 01:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Call of Duty 2
- Result: Archived as a stale discussion. No evidence of anyone wishing to change its GA status yet. -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 21:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
As I see it, fails the 'broad in coverage aspect', giving only a brief bit about anything besides gameplay and plot. The lead reflects this lack of information- it talks about mobile phone versions, but I haven't seen anything in the article about it. David Fuchs ( talk) 01:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Woah, I guess I was biased in looking at it when I wrote it...anyways, I'll go add to the reception (etc.) sections now. Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Gameplay synopsis is a TAD long, but not much, and there is enough on reception and press coverage that I don't see anything worth delisting over... -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 06:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The refs are inconsistent with formatting - accessed 19 July 2007 and Retrieved on November 16, 2007. A lot of references are missing publisher and dates. With the IGN references say which page it is because all the refs look the same. M3tal H3ad ( talk) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Only problem I see is with the inconsistent citations. Drewcifer ( talk) 01:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)