The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: delisted Although the nomination for re-assessment is rather vague, I found a number of long outstanding citation needed tags and dead links. The prose could certainly do with a brush up and the organization of the article is poor. I would suggest a thorough clean up, followed by a
peer review before renominating at
WP:GAN.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
18:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
I request the re-assessment of the article bhagavad gita, because :
- The article does not provide relevant information in the relevant section.
- The introductory paragraph sounds awkward,as it contains referenced appraisal by some other persons, which is not the way to introduce a major book of a major religion of the world and may not represent a worldwide view of the topic.
- The article, related to a major religious book is relatively less informative and neutral than the other major religious books of the world , like
quran,
bible or
guru granth sahib.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bineetojha (
talk •
contribs)
09:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I see no evidence that primary editors or projects have been informed, which you should do. I fixed the article talk page as the GAR template had not been transcluded. Jezhotwells ( talk) 00:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: delisted Although the nomination for re-assessment is rather vague, I found a number of long outstanding citation needed tags and dead links. The prose could certainly do with a brush up and the organization of the article is poor. I would suggest a thorough clean up, followed by a
peer review before renominating at
WP:GAN.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
18:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
I request the re-assessment of the article bhagavad gita, because :
- The article does not provide relevant information in the relevant section.
- The introductory paragraph sounds awkward,as it contains referenced appraisal by some other persons, which is not the way to introduce a major book of a major religion of the world and may not represent a worldwide view of the topic.
- The article, related to a major religious book is relatively less informative and neutral than the other major religious books of the world , like
quran,
bible or
guru granth sahib.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bineetojha (
talk •
contribs)
09:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I see no evidence that primary editors or projects have been informed, which you should do. I fixed the article talk page as the GAR template had not been transcluded. Jezhotwells ( talk) 00:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.