The following is an archived discussion of a good article reassessment. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:good article reassessment. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus 16:01, 27 November 2007.

I'm doubting the article status due to the following concerns:

1. The lead section is far too sparse to be a concise overview of the article.

Wildroot 15:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

1. The Plot section is too long.

Wildroot 15:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

1. The non-free images in the article besides the identifying image have insufficient fair use rationales.

Wildroot 15:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

1. The Box office performance section is too sparse to warrant its own section.

Wildroot 15:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

1. There is no Critical reaction section from independent perspectives to comment on the film.

Hopefully these concerns can be addressed. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 20:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC) reply