Antoni Gaudí
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. (
t ·
c)
buidhe
07:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails GA criterion 2b. Is lacking in inline citations. For example, the following paragraphs are completely uncited: first, fifth, and seventh paras in "Adulthood and professional work"; first para in "Gaudí and Modernisme"; fourth para in "Surpassing the Gothic"; all of "Urban spaces and landscaping"; first para of "Works"; last para of "University years"; etc. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 16:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Agree about a shortage of in line citations. Also the citation style is not consistent (which I will work on now). I think that the existing references almost certainly contain sufficient information and just need the inlines added. I also think that there should probably be a Further reading section for all sorts of additional material. Gusfriend ( talk) 01:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- The citation style is now more consistent. I have also tagged a couple of references as possibly being user generated content. Gusfriend ( talk) 23:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- @
PerfectSoundWhatever: It seems you forgot to notify the major WikiProjects. Given that it's a VIT4 article, we may be able to find somebody willing to rescue it. Gusfriend, nice work so far. Just FYI (you likely know this); consistent citations and a further reading section are not part of the GA criteria.
—Femke 🐦 (
talk)
08:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would also mention it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vital Articles as there are a bunch of people there who are generalists. Improving citation consistency fits in with being a member of the VA WikiProject and is generally a good thing that I try to do from time to time. Gusfriend ( talk) 10:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'll do that now. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 18:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist - currently we have orange template on top, 18 'Citation needed' and 3 'unreliable source?' tags, poorly written and partly unsourced Collaborators section, and extremely poor Death and legacy section. Article needs a lot of work, and now it's not a GA. Artem.G ( talk) 16:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Antoni Gaudí
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. (
t ·
c)
buidhe
07:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails GA criterion 2b. Is lacking in inline citations. For example, the following paragraphs are completely uncited: first, fifth, and seventh paras in "Adulthood and professional work"; first para in "Gaudí and Modernisme"; fourth para in "Surpassing the Gothic"; all of "Urban spaces and landscaping"; first para of "Works"; last para of "University years"; etc. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 16:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Agree about a shortage of in line citations. Also the citation style is not consistent (which I will work on now). I think that the existing references almost certainly contain sufficient information and just need the inlines added. I also think that there should probably be a Further reading section for all sorts of additional material. Gusfriend ( talk) 01:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- The citation style is now more consistent. I have also tagged a couple of references as possibly being user generated content. Gusfriend ( talk) 23:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- @
PerfectSoundWhatever: It seems you forgot to notify the major WikiProjects. Given that it's a VIT4 article, we may be able to find somebody willing to rescue it. Gusfriend, nice work so far. Just FYI (you likely know this); consistent citations and a further reading section are not part of the GA criteria.
—Femke 🐦 (
talk)
08:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would also mention it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vital Articles as there are a bunch of people there who are generalists. Improving citation consistency fits in with being a member of the VA WikiProject and is generally a good thing that I try to do from time to time. Gusfriend ( talk) 10:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'll do that now. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 18:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist - currently we have orange template on top, 18 'Citation needed' and 3 'unreliable source?' tags, poorly written and partly unsourced Collaborators section, and extremely poor Death and legacy section. Article needs a lot of work, and now it's not a GA. Artem.G ( talk) 16:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)