The result of the discussion was: delete. "Keep" !votes don't actually address WP:NFCC policy. ✗ plicit 00:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
The North American (or US) cover art was de-PRODded without rationale, so I can't help wonder what I'm missing when reading the article and looking at the cover arts. Sure, this cover art credits "Wham! Featuring George Michael", while the other cover art solely credits "George Michael".
However, is it needed, and would deleting this cover art detriment the understanding of the topic in question? Do both cover arts convey same or different information? Is the understanding of the song inadequate without this (American) cover art? Honestly, there's already one (British) cover art, but I just now see an extra cover art uploaded and then inserted about five years ago. George Ho ( talk) 05:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Because it's missing another cover!Please be careful of circular reasoning in your arguments. The WP:AADD and WP:AAIDD essays should help you learn how to make your arguments count. George Ho ( talk) 16:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Resolved, offending revision has been replaced - Fastily 01:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Part of this image appears in Getty Images. Violates WP:GETTY... and WP:NFCC#2. George Ho ( talk) 08:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The entire software is copyrighted, but this is a screenshot containing nothing complex for copyright with some text and simple icons and shapes. An ineligible portion of the entire copyrighted content isn't copyrighted. Kys5g talk! 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. "Keep" !votes don't actually address WP:NFCC policy. ✗ plicit 00:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
The North American (or US) cover art was de-PRODded without rationale, so I can't help wonder what I'm missing when reading the article and looking at the cover arts. Sure, this cover art credits "Wham! Featuring George Michael", while the other cover art solely credits "George Michael".
However, is it needed, and would deleting this cover art detriment the understanding of the topic in question? Do both cover arts convey same or different information? Is the understanding of the song inadequate without this (American) cover art? Honestly, there's already one (British) cover art, but I just now see an extra cover art uploaded and then inserted about five years ago. George Ho ( talk) 05:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Because it's missing another cover!Please be careful of circular reasoning in your arguments. The WP:AADD and WP:AAIDD essays should help you learn how to make your arguments count. George Ho ( talk) 16:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Resolved, offending revision has been replaced - Fastily 01:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Part of this image appears in Getty Images. Violates WP:GETTY... and WP:NFCC#2. George Ho ( talk) 08:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The entire software is copyrighted, but this is a screenshot containing nothing complex for copyright with some text and simple icons and shapes. An ineligible portion of the entire copyrighted content isn't copyrighted. Kys5g talk! 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)