The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 10:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. Any derivative work based upon the artwork would be a copyright violation, so creation of a free image is not possible. The file will be used only in the Infobox. None of which is relevant to its possible use in the infobox on the article on the city of Hyderabad.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 10:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. Any derivative work based upon the artwork would be a copyright violation, so creation of a free image is not possible. The file is used only in the infobox to depict city landscape. This has little relevance to its possible use in the infobox on the article on the city of Hyderabad. There are far more good photographs of Hyderabad on Commons than we could possibly use in the article on the city. As for the article on the Khajaguda Lake; it already has an entirely satisfactory photograph in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 23:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
The copyright of this film or TV work expired in 2015. Please use {{PD-China-film}} to replace the original fair use label. Fumikas Sagisavas ( talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsure if PD but definitely not a CC-licensed file. Seems a tad redundant to File:Luang Pu Bunleua Sulilat.png to be converted to a fair use file. -- Min☠︎rax«¦ talk¦» 15:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗ plicit 00:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There's already an album cover at the article, a second one doesn't significantly improve contextual understanding per
WP:NFCC8. —Matrix(!) {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
If the album has been released with different album covers, they can be added to the infobox using this template. However, per WP:NFCC#3 use of non-free content is to be minimal, and not to be used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. An alternative cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.the wub "?!" 17:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
significantly different, however both covers use the same style, and the background image is the same barring the colours. There is not that big of a difference that would leave a reader confused IMO. —Matrix(!) { user - talk? -
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 10:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. Any derivative work based upon the artwork would be a copyright violation, so creation of a free image is not possible. The file will be used only in the Infobox. None of which is relevant to its possible use in the infobox on the article on the city of Hyderabad.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 — DaxServer ( t· m· e· c) 10:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. Any derivative work based upon the artwork would be a copyright violation, so creation of a free image is not possible. The file is used only in the infobox to depict city landscape. This has little relevance to its possible use in the infobox on the article on the city of Hyderabad. There are far more good photographs of Hyderabad on Commons than we could possibly use in the article on the city. As for the article on the Khajaguda Lake; it already has an entirely satisfactory photograph in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 23:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
The copyright of this film or TV work expired in 2015. Please use {{PD-China-film}} to replace the original fair use label. Fumikas Sagisavas ( talk) 11:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsure if PD but definitely not a CC-licensed file. Seems a tad redundant to File:Luang Pu Bunleua Sulilat.png to be converted to a fair use file. -- Min☠︎rax«¦ talk¦» 15:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗ plicit 00:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There's already an album cover at the article, a second one doesn't significantly improve contextual understanding per
WP:NFCC8. —Matrix(!) {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
If the album has been released with different album covers, they can be added to the infobox using this template. However, per WP:NFCC#3 use of non-free content is to be minimal, and not to be used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. An alternative cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.the wub "?!" 17:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
significantly different, however both covers use the same style, and the background image is the same barring the colours. There is not that big of a difference that would leave a reader confused IMO. —Matrix(!) { user - talk? -
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)