Non-notable fan art of an historical figure. Should have no place under fair use (we barely allow artistic depictions of unknown provenance).
Also copyright on Artstation is borne by the artist and that website i.e. "The artist has already published this artwork for free on their website." is not a valid rationale. Gotitbro ( talk) 05:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
According to South Korea's copyright law and recent cases involving copyright, it is speculated that the logo is most likely a work in the public domain. This is because it is a coat of arms created by the South Korean government that is not eligible for copyright protection, and the design of the coat of arms is too simple. It is recommended to remove the fair use label and replace it with {{PD-KRGov}}{{PD-shape}}. Fumikas Sagisavas ( talk) 13:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable fan art of an historical figure. Should have no place under fair use (we barely allow artistic depictions of unknown provenance).
Also copyright on Artstation is borne by the artist and that website i.e. "The artist has already published this artwork for free on their website." is not a valid rationale. Gotitbro ( talk) 05:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
According to South Korea's copyright law and recent cases involving copyright, it is speculated that the logo is most likely a work in the public domain. This is because it is a coat of arms created by the South Korean government that is not eligible for copyright protection, and the design of the coat of arms is too simple. It is recommended to remove the fair use label and replace it with {{PD-KRGov}}{{PD-shape}}. Fumikas Sagisavas ( talk) 13:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)