The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned, Obsolete, File:Schumacher Cori2021.jpg. Beyawnd8 ( talk) 01:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This 2018 archived file (file was pulled from an inactive web archive) was replaced by an updated and actively used file (copyright permissions given and publicly accessible). In addition, the 2018 file is no longer connected to the Schumacher wiki. Changes should be watched for potential vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyawnd8 ( talk • contribs) 01:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Posting in an yearbook is not a publication. — Ирука 13 02:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Under copyright law, publication is the distribution of copies a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership or by rental, lease, or lending. Offering to distribute copies to a group of people for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display also constitutes publication.[1] — Ирука 13 18:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The uploader has file problems in history, so in the end, from his 54 edits, only this file remained. This is a good reason to re-find the source of this photo in order to establish the date and place of publication. — Ирука 13 18:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Yearbookand
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
An unused outdated image with questionable license. — Ирука 13 02:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a citation from a reliable source that explicitly describes this image as PD - FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{ PD-URAA}} does not fit, as there is no information where the image was published before 1978. Where the uploader got the information about "50 years after creation" is unknown. — Ирука 13 03:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to PD. Defaulting to {{
PD-ineligible-USonly}}
, however anyone is free to update the license to PD-logo if this is PD in the UK as well. -
FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Former logo, fails WP:NFCC#8 as it doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the article. There is a paragraph about logo histories, but most of it isn't specifically about this logo. Also, fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items in an article. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
FASTILY 03:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 15:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
c. 1905but I can't find this information on the linked source page. Where does the year come from? The year was added in Special:Diff/186889035 by User:Ssilvers.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Delaunay triangulation example.png —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) { user page (@ commons) - talk} 15:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 16:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 16:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 9. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photo was published between 1978 and 1989. — Ирука 13 19:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Missing verifiable source. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a citation from a reliable source that explicitly describes this image as PD - FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Old photo with {{ CC-BY-NC-ND}} license. — Ирука 13 11:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE 21:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 9. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
The image is not in the public domain in the US, as it was published after 1928. — Ирука 13 23:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
An unused file of dubious encyclopedic value. — Ирука 13 23:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned, Obsolete, File:Schumacher Cori2021.jpg. Beyawnd8 ( talk) 01:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This 2018 archived file (file was pulled from an inactive web archive) was replaced by an updated and actively used file (copyright permissions given and publicly accessible). In addition, the 2018 file is no longer connected to the Schumacher wiki. Changes should be watched for potential vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyawnd8 ( talk • contribs) 01:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Posting in an yearbook is not a publication. — Ирука 13 02:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Under copyright law, publication is the distribution of copies a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership or by rental, lease, or lending. Offering to distribute copies to a group of people for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display also constitutes publication.[1] — Ирука 13 18:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The uploader has file problems in history, so in the end, from his 54 edits, only this file remained. This is a good reason to re-find the source of this photo in order to establish the date and place of publication. — Ирука 13 18:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Yearbookand
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
An unused outdated image with questionable license. — Ирука 13 02:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a citation from a reliable source that explicitly describes this image as PD - FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{ PD-URAA}} does not fit, as there is no information where the image was published before 1978. Where the uploader got the information about "50 years after creation" is unknown. — Ирука 13 03:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to PD. Defaulting to {{
PD-ineligible-USonly}}
, however anyone is free to update the license to PD-logo if this is PD in the UK as well. -
FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Former logo, fails WP:NFCC#8 as it doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the article. There is a paragraph about logo histories, but most of it isn't specifically about this logo. Also, fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items in an article. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
FASTILY 03:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 15:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
c. 1905but I can't find this information on the linked source page. Where does the year come from? The year was added in Special:Diff/186889035 by User:Ssilvers.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Delaunay triangulation example.png —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) { user page (@ commons) - talk} 15:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 16:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no information that the photo was published somewhere. — Ирука 13 16:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 9. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photo was published between 1978 and 1989. — Ирука 13 19:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Missing verifiable source. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a citation from a reliable source that explicitly describes this image as PD - FASTILY 08:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Old photo with {{ CC-BY-NC-ND}} license. — Ирука 13 11:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE 21:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 9. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
The image is not in the public domain in the US, as it was published after 1928. — Ирука 13 23:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
An unused file of dubious encyclopedic value. — Ирука 13 23:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)