The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via WP:VRT 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. None of the respondents think that deletion is what needs to be done, and no one has made an argument against the fair use rationale. (non-admin closure) — Alalch E. 16:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The artwork itself is a copyvio of Super Mario Bros. sprites. QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 11:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not an appropriate file for fair use, per WP:NFCC#8, which states that the file must: "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". This logo does not accomplish this, as we can just show the picture of the building itself, as we do in all other articles about buildings or structures. Bestagon ⬡ 20:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 November 9. Whpq ( talk) 02:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via WP:VRT 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. None of the respondents think that deletion is what needs to be done, and no one has made an argument against the fair use rationale. (non-admin closure) — Alalch E. 16:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The artwork itself is a copyvio of Super Mario Bros. sprites. QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 11:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not an appropriate file for fair use, per WP:NFCC#8, which states that the file must: "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". This logo does not accomplish this, as we can just show the picture of the building itself, as we do in all other articles about buildings or structures. Bestagon ⬡ 20:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 November 9. Whpq ( talk) 02:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)