The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The design of these two specific blocks are likely below the threshold of originality and therefore not copyrightable. The description states the photograph is under a free license but does not specify which. Ixfd64 ( talk) 19:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow time for uploader to respond
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Whpq (
talk) 11:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Using nonfree images of a war to illustrate a war is not allowed under NFCC #8. It is specifically disallowed at WP:NFC#UUI #5:
25stargeneral ( talk) 17:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)An image whose subject happens to be a war, to illustrate an article on the war. Use may be appropriate if the image itself is a proper subject for commentary in the article: for example, an iconic image that has received attention in its own right, if the image is discussed in the article.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - FASTILY 02:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The purpose of the file fails to reach the standard set for use of non-free images. This logo serves little to no purpose in visually identifying the subject of the article, a physical stadium, especially when plenty of free images are available that can serve visual identification much better then this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The design of these two specific blocks are likely below the threshold of originality and therefore not copyrightable. The description states the photograph is under a free license but does not specify which. Ixfd64 ( talk) 19:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow time for uploader to respond
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Whpq (
talk) 11:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Using nonfree images of a war to illustrate a war is not allowed under NFCC #8. It is specifically disallowed at WP:NFC#UUI #5:
25stargeneral ( talk) 17:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)An image whose subject happens to be a war, to illustrate an article on the war. Use may be appropriate if the image itself is a proper subject for commentary in the article: for example, an iconic image that has received attention in its own right, if the image is discussed in the article.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - FASTILY 02:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The purpose of the file fails to reach the standard set for use of non-free images. This logo serves little to no purpose in visually identifying the subject of the article, a physical stadium, especially when plenty of free images are available that can serve visual identification much better then this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)