The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, no nonfree use rationale is present at all. The fact that the individual was on the show can be covered adequately by text; an image is unnecessary for that to be made clear.
SeraphimbladeTalk to me19:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Oh wow I don’t know how I forgot to do that. I can do that now? But I guess that does little to change what you have just said about the relevance of the file. I will go ahead and do that regardless! Thanks for the heads up.
4theloveofallthings (
talk)
20:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Eh to be honest with you, I see your point. I didn’t really think that one through. I want to do a rationale but I agree with what you just said .. so I am going to have to say delete but also, should I mark the file for speedy deletion since I am the user who contributed it? Or do I let the discussion play out? Genuinely not sure how that works.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
As it is a education related University, the logo is available in many public platforms like social media platforms and news portals to identify the University with the pictorial representation of data, that is very useful for the students and parents for school selection process. And I see the source site is also revised the copyright text on their website. Please don't delete, I'm going to recreate the article with all the guidelines. Thank you.
Ravi Krishna Metta (
talk)
04:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
If you recreate an article that is appropriate and not promotional, you could use the logo under the
nonfree content criteria; it is essentially always permitted to use an organization's current nonfree logo in an article about that organization. But it is not a public domain image, and you can't inaccurately label as that. "Available to the public" is not the same as "public domain".
SeraphimbladeTalk to me05:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, no nonfree use rationale is present at all. The fact that the individual was on the show can be covered adequately by text; an image is unnecessary for that to be made clear.
SeraphimbladeTalk to me19:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Oh wow I don’t know how I forgot to do that. I can do that now? But I guess that does little to change what you have just said about the relevance of the file. I will go ahead and do that regardless! Thanks for the heads up.
4theloveofallthings (
talk)
20:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Eh to be honest with you, I see your point. I didn’t really think that one through. I want to do a rationale but I agree with what you just said .. so I am going to have to say delete but also, should I mark the file for speedy deletion since I am the user who contributed it? Or do I let the discussion play out? Genuinely not sure how that works.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
As it is a education related University, the logo is available in many public platforms like social media platforms and news portals to identify the University with the pictorial representation of data, that is very useful for the students and parents for school selection process. And I see the source site is also revised the copyright text on their website. Please don't delete, I'm going to recreate the article with all the guidelines. Thank you.
Ravi Krishna Metta (
talk)
04:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
If you recreate an article that is appropriate and not promotional, you could use the logo under the
nonfree content criteria; it is essentially always permitted to use an organization's current nonfree logo in an article about that organization. But it is not a public domain image, and you can't inaccurately label as that. "Available to the public" is not the same as "public domain".
SeraphimbladeTalk to me05:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.