The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Cyclamate contains no sourced commentary on the purpose of the use, which does not require an image in the first place, and Funny Face (drink mix) already uses a different image focusing on racial stereotypes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Putting this up for discussion rather than PROD in the hopes this gets more attention – a source has been specified, but it is a permanently dead link (archive.org only has this dead archive link, and I was unable to find anything else relevant). No way to tell that it was released under the given license, but maybe someone will be able to successfully find the source in some corner of the internet? House Blaster talk 03:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Judging by the file description page, this is a non-free image, used as free. — Ирука 13 04:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not "simple" in terms of Italian law: it is not a simple "life photo"; this is definitely a portrait shooting and the photographer’s intention can be seen both in the turn of the head and in the look, and, probably, the dress uniform was specially selected. The photo did not enter the public domain 70 years after the death of the author, as the author is unknown. — Ирука 13 06:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, not a matter for FfD; you don't need permission to transfer eligible (and/or mistagged) files to Commons. - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Want to export to commons it is derived from Emblem of Islamic Republic Baratiiman ( talk) 08:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
We know that the photo was taken in the 40s. But we don't know if it was published before 1989. {{ PD-Italy}} has no confirmation. — Ирука 13 12:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a free simple logo. — Ирука
13 14:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to {{ PD-ineligible-USonly|Spain}} - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Below c:COM:TOO US and relicense to {{ PD-ineligible-USonly|Spain}}? Jonteemil ( talk) 19:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
If evaluate this photo not by {{ PD-Austria}}, but by c:Template:PD-Austria, then this is not a simple photo. This means that the period should be counted from the date of death of the author. And the author is unknown. The file should be relicensed as {{ PD-old-assumed}}. — Ирука 13 02:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Rationale states "Main infobox", however it is used in a secondary infobox in the article of the soundtrack's film, and thus is not primary identification. Per WP:NFCCP, number 8 "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." No caption is available, and it is unlikely any critical commentary can be made. Gerald WL 08:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Want to export to Commons but can't under normal means Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 21:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: No consensus - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NFCC#8. The video sample is not the subject of commentary within the article and does not provide significant improvement to the article. :3 F4U ( they /it) 22:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Sultan's Great Day became a breeding stallion at age 4 under the management and supervision of Donna Moore. Among Donna's top breeding selections were daughters of New Yorker, a widely recognized sire of champion Saddlebreds.
replaceable with textual coverage.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaulting to status quo (non-free) - FASTILY 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Below c:COM:TOO US and relicense to {{ PD-textlogo}}? Jonteemil ( talk) 22:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, wrong venue. For future reference, please use {{
Non-free reduce|type=video}}
. -
FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Fail to see how a 1920x784 resolution sample is minimal; bringing this here so that hopefully someone can downsize it. :3 F4U ( they /it) 23:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Cyclamate contains no sourced commentary on the purpose of the use, which does not require an image in the first place, and Funny Face (drink mix) already uses a different image focusing on racial stereotypes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Putting this up for discussion rather than PROD in the hopes this gets more attention – a source has been specified, but it is a permanently dead link (archive.org only has this dead archive link, and I was unable to find anything else relevant). No way to tell that it was released under the given license, but maybe someone will be able to successfully find the source in some corner of the internet? House Blaster talk 03:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Judging by the file description page, this is a non-free image, used as free. — Ирука 13 04:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not "simple" in terms of Italian law: it is not a simple "life photo"; this is definitely a portrait shooting and the photographer’s intention can be seen both in the turn of the head and in the look, and, probably, the dress uniform was specially selected. The photo did not enter the public domain 70 years after the death of the author, as the author is unknown. — Ирука 13 06:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, not a matter for FfD; you don't need permission to transfer eligible (and/or mistagged) files to Commons. - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Want to export to commons it is derived from Emblem of Islamic Republic Baratiiman ( talk) 08:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
We know that the photo was taken in the 40s. But we don't know if it was published before 1989. {{ PD-Italy}} has no confirmation. — Ирука 13 12:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a free simple logo. — Ирука
13 14:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to {{ PD-ineligible-USonly|Spain}} - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Below c:COM:TOO US and relicense to {{ PD-ineligible-USonly|Spain}}? Jonteemil ( talk) 19:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
If evaluate this photo not by {{ PD-Austria}}, but by c:Template:PD-Austria, then this is not a simple photo. This means that the period should be counted from the date of death of the author. And the author is unknown. The file should be relicensed as {{ PD-old-assumed}}. — Ирука 13 02:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Rationale states "Main infobox", however it is used in a secondary infobox in the article of the soundtrack's film, and thus is not primary identification. Per WP:NFCCP, number 8 "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." No caption is available, and it is unlikely any critical commentary can be made. Gerald WL 08:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Want to export to Commons but can't under normal means Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 21:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: No consensus - FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NFCC#8. The video sample is not the subject of commentary within the article and does not provide significant improvement to the article. :3 F4U ( they /it) 22:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Sultan's Great Day became a breeding stallion at age 4 under the management and supervision of Donna Moore. Among Donna's top breeding selections were daughters of New Yorker, a widely recognized sire of champion Saddlebreds.
replaceable with textual coverage.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaulting to status quo (non-free) - FASTILY 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Below c:COM:TOO US and relicense to {{ PD-textlogo}}? Jonteemil ( talk) 22:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, wrong venue. For future reference, please use {{
Non-free reduce|type=video}}
. -
FASTILY 08:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Fail to see how a 1920x784 resolution sample is minimal; bringing this here so that hopefully someone can downsize it. :3 F4U ( they /it) 23:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)