The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1, as it is replaceable with the public domain logo File:Delhi Capitals Logo.png. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
We already have a licensed image of the engine, and the article does not have any significant commentary about test firings. Therefore, I don't believe this image qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Likely doesn't qualify for fair use anymore as free alternatives have been made available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't think we really need a non-free image of a model when high-quality artist's renderings are freely available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1, as it is replaceable with the public domain logo File:Delhi Capitals Logo.png. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
We already have a licensed image of the engine, and the article does not have any significant commentary about test firings. Therefore, I don't believe this image qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Likely doesn't qualify for fair use anymore as free alternatives have been made available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't think we really need a non-free image of a model when high-quality artist's renderings are freely available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)