From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 5

File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AkshayAnand ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#1, as it is replaceable with the public domain logo File:Delhi Capitals Logo.png. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Duccio ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

We already have a licensed image of the engine, and the article does not have any significant commentary about test firings. Therefore, I don't believe this image qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Transparent.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Euclid Transparent.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ultimograph5 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely doesn't qualify for fair use anymore as free alternatives have been made available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pippo skaio ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't think we really need a non-free image of a model when high-quality artist's renderings are freely available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment it is an engineering model, meaning a full scale replica with parts replicated to as close to flight hardware as fidelity is needed to test. So many times, these are copies of the flight hardware and can be used as spare parts, so not a render but a duplication of the real thing. Thus this would be more real than any artwork. -- 64.229.90.172 ( talk) 04:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 5

File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Delhi Capitals Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AkshayAnand ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#1, as it is replaceable with the public domain logo File:Delhi Capitals Logo.png. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Vulcain 2 test firing.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Duccio ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

We already have a licensed image of the engine, and the article does not have any significant commentary about test firings. Therefore, I don't believe this image qualifies for fair use. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Transparent.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Euclid Transparent.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ultimograph5 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely doesn't qualify for fair use anymore as free alternatives have been made available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

File:Euclid Structural and thermal model.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pippo skaio ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't think we really need a non-free image of a model when high-quality artist's renderings are freely available at c:Category:Euclid (spacecraft). Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment it is an engineering model, meaning a full scale replica with parts replicated to as close to flight hardware as fidelity is needed to test. So many times, these are copies of the flight hardware and can be used as spare parts, so not a render but a duplication of the real thing. Thus this would be more real than any artwork. -- 64.229.90.172 ( talk) 04:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook