The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
✗plicit 23:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
If there is the duplication as indicated, can see the rationale for removing the one not being used or merging the use to this extension, .jpg -- but see no reason to prohibit the uploading editor from being able to request "keeping local" and see no harm to WP for allowing the exercise of that choice by an uploading editor. Vote to keep this file. _ _ _ _
83d40m (
talk) 04:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - There is no requirement that files must be moved to Commons and deleted locally. The keep local template has been kept through 3 TFDs so there is consensus that an uploader can request a local copy be kept. This appears to be a good faith request to keep local, and the existence of the file locally is not causing any issue. --
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
✗plicit 23:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Contesting keep local. No apparent need for this locally as it is unused. This is also a US government work so the licensing is ok. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 04:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
If there is the duplication as indicated, can see the rationale for removing the one not being used or merging the use to this extension, .jpeg -- but see no reason to prohibit the uploading editor from being able to request "keeping local" and see no harm to WP for allowing the exercise of that choice by an uploading editor. Vote to delete this .jpeg file, and to "keep local" the .jpg file. _ _ _ _
83d40m (
talk) 04:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - There is no requirement that files must be moved to Commons and deleted locally. The keep local template has been kept through 3 TFDs so there is consensus that an uploader can request a local copy be kept. This appears to be a good faith request to keep local, and the existence of the file locally is not causing any issue. --
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Presumably taken in France, which has no freedom of panorama at all. Design is likely above the ToO. Image is not used anywhere.
Ixfd64 (
talk) 21:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing.
Salavat (
talk) 00:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
✗plicit 23:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
If there is the duplication as indicated, can see the rationale for removing the one not being used or merging the use to this extension, .jpg -- but see no reason to prohibit the uploading editor from being able to request "keeping local" and see no harm to WP for allowing the exercise of that choice by an uploading editor. Vote to keep this file. _ _ _ _
83d40m (
talk) 04:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - There is no requirement that files must be moved to Commons and deleted locally. The keep local template has been kept through 3 TFDs so there is consensus that an uploader can request a local copy be kept. This appears to be a good faith request to keep local, and the existence of the file locally is not causing any issue. --
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
✗plicit 23:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Contesting keep local. No apparent need for this locally as it is unused. This is also a US government work so the licensing is ok. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 04:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
If there is the duplication as indicated, can see the rationale for removing the one not being used or merging the use to this extension, .jpeg -- but see no reason to prohibit the uploading editor from being able to request "keeping local" and see no harm to WP for allowing the exercise of that choice by an uploading editor. Vote to delete this .jpeg file, and to "keep local" the .jpg file. _ _ _ _
83d40m (
talk) 04:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - There is no requirement that files must be moved to Commons and deleted locally. The keep local template has been kept through 3 TFDs so there is consensus that an uploader can request a local copy be kept. This appears to be a good faith request to keep local, and the existence of the file locally is not causing any issue. --
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
Whpq (
talk) 22:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Presumably taken in France, which has no freedom of panorama at all. Design is likely above the ToO. Image is not used anywhere.
Ixfd64 (
talk) 21:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing.
Salavat (
talk) 00:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.