From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 4

File:Jon gtr 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Jon gtr 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jackofdiamonds77 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused photo of a nonnotable personn. Free license unverified Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Moved from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File:Jon gtr 2.jpg * Pppery * it has begun... 17:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SecondaryStructureSDH.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:SecondaryStructureSDH.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MIsmaiStanford ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, near duplicate of File:SecondarySSDH.jpg on Commons. plicit 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat ( talk) 02:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nick5day.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Nick5day.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:Nicknearvrad.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Serenati.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned images of non-notable individuals. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. plicit 12:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ELEUTHEROUPOLIFCBADGE1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:ELEUTHEROUPOLIFCBADGE1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skycraper ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused logo above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holiday Inn Garden Court Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Holiday Inn Garden Court Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Warren Whyte ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused logo not suitable for Commons. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Clearly usable on the Holiday Inn page. Insinuating it has no value when it clearly does is odd (at best) Buffs ( talk) 04:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep since the file is now being used in Holiday Inn#Logos. Unless there's a reason to doubt that correctness of it's license and convert this to a non-free license, I can't think of a reason for deleting it. The use of former logo in stand-alone galleries in articles may sometimes have questionable encyclopedic value per WP:IG, but that can be resolved through normal editing by better incorporating the logo into the body of the article near relevant text. It is only non-free former logos that really aren't allowed to be used in this way per WP:NFG and WP:NFC#cite_note-4, and {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} licensed logos are subject to WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep a relevant company logo, suitable for commons. Warren ( talk) 11:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KCML2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:KCML2.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Unknown User1234 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely above the threshold of originality due to the effects. Could possibly qualify for fair use. I'm not sure it qualifies for fair use because the normal logo at File:KCML.png is certainly below the ToO. From what I could tell, the more complex version is only used during the holidays. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5zlotych1925.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 May 14. FASTILY 20:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:5zlotych1925.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 4

File:Jon gtr 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Jon gtr 2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jackofdiamonds77 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused photo of a nonnotable personn. Free license unverified Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Moved from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File:Jon gtr 2.jpg * Pppery * it has begun... 17:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SecondaryStructureSDH.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:SecondaryStructureSDH.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MIsmaiStanford ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, near duplicate of File:SecondarySSDH.jpg on Commons. plicit 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat ( talk) 02:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nick5day.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 ( talk) 23:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Nick5day.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:Nicknearvrad.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Serenati.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Animeking237 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned images of non-notable individuals. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. plicit 12:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ELEUTHEROUPOLIFCBADGE1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:ELEUTHEROUPOLIFCBADGE1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skycraper ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused logo above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 02:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holiday Inn Garden Court Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:Holiday Inn Garden Court Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Warren Whyte ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused logo not suitable for Commons. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 02:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Clearly usable on the Holiday Inn page. Insinuating it has no value when it clearly does is odd (at best) Buffs ( talk) 04:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep since the file is now being used in Holiday Inn#Logos. Unless there's a reason to doubt that correctness of it's license and convert this to a non-free license, I can't think of a reason for deleting it. The use of former logo in stand-alone galleries in articles may sometimes have questionable encyclopedic value per WP:IG, but that can be resolved through normal editing by better incorporating the logo into the body of the article near relevant text. It is only non-free former logos that really aren't allowed to be used in this way per WP:NFG and WP:NFC#cite_note-4, and {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} licensed logos are subject to WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep a relevant company logo, suitable for commons. Warren ( talk) 11:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KCML2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:KCML2.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Unknown User1234 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely above the threshold of originality due to the effects. Could possibly qualify for fair use. I'm not sure it qualifies for fair use because the normal logo at File:KCML.png is certainly below the ToO. From what I could tell, the more complex version is only used during the holidays. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5zlotych1925.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 May 14. FASTILY 20:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC) reply

File:5zlotych1925.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook