The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I believe this is a work by Maurice Bennett, who died in 2016. This is too recent to be in the Public Domain for New Zealand (source country) or United States. MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 00:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from a 1971 US film, Paper Man, which the uploader has claimed to be public domain. But the film has a copyright notice ( at 1:29:20), so it won't enter the public domain until 2067. Wikiacc ( ¶) 02:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Recording of an East German youth choir singing a song by Reinhold Limberg (d. 1997). Claimed public domain here and claimed CC-BY-SA elsewhere [1] [2]. I don't see how the song could be under anything other than full copyright. Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work as photo quality and lack of metadata suggest this is a screen grab from a video. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 03:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Just used for decoration in an infobox, not used for any critical and educational purpose. Fails WP:NFCC. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This image is asserted to be freely licensed, and includes a link to a
disclaimer page which identifies specific images which are under a CC BY-SA 4.0. Note that the wording in the disclaimer is very specific You can re-use the content given under the head "Content for public use" on this page by complying with the following terms and conditions
(emphasis added). There is an image of Asim Munir listed but it is different from the one uploaded. As well, there is an
archive for Dec 6 with the same timestamp as the upload, but it shows yet another image for Asim munir. Given that we have no copy of the disclaimer page showing this specific image of Asim Munir as being under a free license, this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license. Note, I have uploaded the image that I did find at the page on Commons. See
c:File:General Asim Munir (Pakistan).jpg.
Whpq (
talk) 18:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
NFCC#1: A free equivalent can be created; the image is not the subject of the article, only an example. SWinxy ( talk) 20:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I believe this is a work by Maurice Bennett, who died in 2016. This is too recent to be in the Public Domain for New Zealand (source country) or United States. MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 00:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from a 1971 US film, Paper Man, which the uploader has claimed to be public domain. But the film has a copyright notice ( at 1:29:20), so it won't enter the public domain until 2067. Wikiacc ( ¶) 02:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Recording of an East German youth choir singing a song by Reinhold Limberg (d. 1997). Claimed public domain here and claimed CC-BY-SA elsewhere [1] [2]. I don't see how the song could be under anything other than full copyright. Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work as photo quality and lack of metadata suggest this is a screen grab from a video. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 03:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Just used for decoration in an infobox, not used for any critical and educational purpose. Fails WP:NFCC. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This image is asserted to be freely licensed, and includes a link to a
disclaimer page which identifies specific images which are under a CC BY-SA 4.0. Note that the wording in the disclaimer is very specific You can re-use the content given under the head "Content for public use" on this page by complying with the following terms and conditions
(emphasis added). There is an image of Asim Munir listed but it is different from the one uploaded. As well, there is an
archive for Dec 6 with the same timestamp as the upload, but it shows yet another image for Asim munir. Given that we have no copy of the disclaimer page showing this specific image of Asim Munir as being under a free license, this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license. Note, I have uploaded the image that I did find at the page on Commons. See
c:File:General Asim Munir (Pakistan).jpg.
Whpq (
talk) 18:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq ( talk) 21:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
NFCC#1: A free equivalent can be created; the image is not the subject of the article, only an example. SWinxy ( talk) 20:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)