The result of the discussion was: All files were deleted by User:Explicit. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 22:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Multiple non-free logos all with a stated purpose of primary visual identificaiton but are not in the infobox as they are historical. The logos are not the subject significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 01:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was:
Licensing says it's in the public domain because it was published before 1926, however the creation date was 1950. UnLeashedWolfie ( talk) 02:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article(s) are significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of contextual significance: "For commentary on the album's background and the release of its lead single Me!" is hardly enough to warrant WP:NFCC criteria 8 ("its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") and 1 ("used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose.") Currently used in two articles: Reputation (Taylor Swift album) and Me!. In the former, another free image currently used ( File:Taylor Swift Reputation Tour3.jpg) is enough to provide understanding on the album's background and conception. In the latter, I am dubious about the significance of this file, because the article already has three non-free files to support. Ippantekina ( talk) 07:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No longer used after the main article, Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, was deleted as a result of an Afd. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. No sourced critical discussion pertaining to what the cover looks like. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing the image from the relevant article.-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 21:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Whose consensus? How many editors were involved, and who are they? I disagree with their reasoning. ≠-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 12:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete File:Live and Let Die by Guns N' Roses overseas artwork.jpg - FASTILY 00:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the US cassette single release of Guns N' Roses's " Live and Let Die" as intended replacement for the standard international, overseas artwork, which was originally under a different file. Then it was replaced with the same overseas artwork, so I uploaded the US cassette single under a different filename. Recently, I replaced the JPEG version with PNG one.
I have wondered whether either image complies with WP:NFCC, especially #8. If so, and if using both images violates WP:NFCC#3a, then either one must be kept. Preferably, either the US retail cassette single should be kept, or both should be deleted. The recording was made by an American rock band, yet the song was initially made for the eponymous film and originally performed by the British-American band. Well, the Guns N' Roses recording peaked high in global music charts, yet I wonder whether a cover art is necessary and too significant for deletion. If so, then I'll lean toward keeping the US cassette single. George Ho ( talk) 23:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently used at My Sharona, Power pop, The Knack and previously PRODded. Even as identity of the song "My Sharona", I have concerns about its compliance with WP:NFCC#8 and whether critical commentary is sufficient enough to support the sample in those articles. The sample should be removed from at least one article if it doesn't comply with that criterion while being used in that article. George Ho ( talk) 23:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC); expanded, 17:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently at Mandopop and Yoshiko Yamaguchi. The sample was de-PRODded under assumption that a sample should teach readers what a 1940s Mandopop song sounded like back then. I'm unsure whether it meets WP:NFCC#8. To me, a sample isn't necessary to tell readers what a Mandarin-language song sounds like, and Mandarin Chinese article already has one sample there. So does Wikimedia Commons. Well, the song has some historical value, but even with such value, the sample still has to comply with NFCC. I'm also unsure whether the sample is needed to learn about Yoshiko Yamaguchi and her singing vocals. George Ho ( talk) 23:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: All files were deleted by User:Explicit. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 22:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Multiple non-free logos all with a stated purpose of primary visual identificaiton but are not in the infobox as they are historical. The logos are not the subject significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 01:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was:
Licensing says it's in the public domain because it was published before 1926, however the creation date was 1950. UnLeashedWolfie ( talk) 02:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article(s) are significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 03:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of contextual significance: "For commentary on the album's background and the release of its lead single Me!" is hardly enough to warrant WP:NFCC criteria 8 ("its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") and 1 ("used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose.") Currently used in two articles: Reputation (Taylor Swift album) and Me!. In the former, another free image currently used ( File:Taylor Swift Reputation Tour3.jpg) is enough to provide understanding on the album's background and conception. In the latter, I am dubious about the significance of this file, because the article already has three non-free files to support. Ippantekina ( talk) 07:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No longer used after the main article, Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, was deleted as a result of an Afd. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. No sourced critical discussion pertaining to what the cover looks like. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing the image from the relevant article.-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 21:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Whose consensus? How many editors were involved, and who are they? I disagree with their reasoning. ≠-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 12:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete File:Live and Let Die by Guns N' Roses overseas artwork.jpg - FASTILY 00:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the US cassette single release of Guns N' Roses's " Live and Let Die" as intended replacement for the standard international, overseas artwork, which was originally under a different file. Then it was replaced with the same overseas artwork, so I uploaded the US cassette single under a different filename. Recently, I replaced the JPEG version with PNG one.
I have wondered whether either image complies with WP:NFCC, especially #8. If so, and if using both images violates WP:NFCC#3a, then either one must be kept. Preferably, either the US retail cassette single should be kept, or both should be deleted. The recording was made by an American rock band, yet the song was initially made for the eponymous film and originally performed by the British-American band. Well, the Guns N' Roses recording peaked high in global music charts, yet I wonder whether a cover art is necessary and too significant for deletion. If so, then I'll lean toward keeping the US cassette single. George Ho ( talk) 23:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently used at My Sharona, Power pop, The Knack and previously PRODded. Even as identity of the song "My Sharona", I have concerns about its compliance with WP:NFCC#8 and whether critical commentary is sufficient enough to support the sample in those articles. The sample should be removed from at least one article if it doesn't comply with that criterion while being used in that article. George Ho ( talk) 23:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC); expanded, 17:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently at Mandopop and Yoshiko Yamaguchi. The sample was de-PRODded under assumption that a sample should teach readers what a 1940s Mandopop song sounded like back then. I'm unsure whether it meets WP:NFCC#8. To me, a sample isn't necessary to tell readers what a Mandarin-language song sounds like, and Mandarin Chinese article already has one sample there. So does Wikimedia Commons. Well, the song has some historical value, but even with such value, the sample still has to comply with NFCC. I'm also unsure whether the sample is needed to learn about Yoshiko Yamaguchi and her singing vocals. George Ho ( talk) 23:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)