The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
We now have a free picture of protestors on the freeway ( File:May 2020 Seattle protest ES 2.jpg) so I don't see how this can meet NFCC#1 or NFCC#8; the other image plus text should be able to convey adequately without a non-free image.
It's possible that the image is not copyrighted to begin with because it is an automated image without originality, but I'll let someone more knowledgeable weigh in on that. b uidh e 01:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★
Bigr
Tex 16:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Relisted to
2020 July 1, per nominator's request. ★
Bigr
Tex
03:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The logo of Sammy Corporation, a Japanese company, was uploaded in 2017 as non-free. The left portion of the logo consists of two simple shapes forming an "S" but doesn't look complex enough to the US courts' eyes. c:COM:TOO US has a gallery of logos whose designs do not suffice enough for copyright protection. On the other hand, c:COM:TOO Japan, while Japan doesn't rely on the " sweat of the brow" doctrine, was vague on how "creative" a work should be to guarantee copyright protection in that country. (Maybe I'm wrong about the Japanese law.) Either the image should be moved to Commons, or it should be re-labeled as "PD-ineligible-USonly". George Ho ( talk) 10:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Resolved - FASTILY 07:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
too high resolution for fair use 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 11:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 16:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
May not be public domain as a newspaper 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 11:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: ( non-admin closure) Out of scope. Files were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so any issues with them will need to be discussed and resolved on Wikimedia Commons. FFD is for discussing files uploaded locally to Wikipedia and thus its scope of application does not cover these files. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, private photo
Unencyclopedic, private photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.98.64.34 ( talk) 16:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Not discussed critically or used for educational purposes, fairly similar to standard cover and the differences can be communicated via text. Fails WP:NFCC#8. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
We now have a free picture of protestors on the freeway ( File:May 2020 Seattle protest ES 2.jpg) so I don't see how this can meet NFCC#1 or NFCC#8; the other image plus text should be able to convey adequately without a non-free image.
It's possible that the image is not copyrighted to begin with because it is an automated image without originality, but I'll let someone more knowledgeable weigh in on that. b uidh e 01:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★
Bigr
Tex 16:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Relisted to
2020 July 1, per nominator's request. ★
Bigr
Tex
03:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The logo of Sammy Corporation, a Japanese company, was uploaded in 2017 as non-free. The left portion of the logo consists of two simple shapes forming an "S" but doesn't look complex enough to the US courts' eyes. c:COM:TOO US has a gallery of logos whose designs do not suffice enough for copyright protection. On the other hand, c:COM:TOO Japan, while Japan doesn't rely on the " sweat of the brow" doctrine, was vague on how "creative" a work should be to guarantee copyright protection in that country. (Maybe I'm wrong about the Japanese law.) Either the image should be moved to Commons, or it should be re-labeled as "PD-ineligible-USonly". George Ho ( talk) 10:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Resolved - FASTILY 07:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
too high resolution for fair use 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 11:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 16:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
May not be public domain as a newspaper 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 ( talk) 11:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: ( non-admin closure) Out of scope. Files were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so any issues with them will need to be discussed and resolved on Wikimedia Commons. FFD is for discussing files uploaded locally to Wikipedia and thus its scope of application does not cover these files. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, private photo
Unencyclopedic, private photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.98.64.34 ( talk) 16:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Not discussed critically or used for educational purposes, fairly similar to standard cover and the differences can be communicated via text. Fails WP:NFCC#8. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)