The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Low Quality; these pictures have a prominent watermark stating the copyright of photo in contradiction of /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Watermarks,_credits,_titles,_and_distortions 202.186.243.111 ( talk) 01:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
This work appears to be copyrighted in Iraq; see c:COM:IRAQ. Though it is legally public domain in the US, WP:Public domain requires that such works be used under WP:NFCC only. Suggest relicense to non-free or delete. Wikiacc ( ¶) 01:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Though this image is used on a Library of Congress website, it is unclear whether it is a US government work. (Also, the image is not used in mainspace.) Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphan image. No evidence of release by copyright holder. ★ Bigr Tex 03:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
The source website shows that as of the date this image was uploaded to Wikipedia, the license was Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share-Alike License 3.0, which is not a compatible license. This is still the license today. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
It's not questionable if it's clearly incompatible. Delete it anyway because it is orphaned(but I like this map, so I am downloading it onto my computer anyway lol). — WinnerWolf99 talk What did I break now? 17:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)*Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 10:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Low Quality; these pictures have a prominent watermark stating the copyright of photo in contradiction of /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Watermarks,_credits,_titles,_and_distortions 202.186.243.111 ( talk) 01:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
This work appears to be copyrighted in Iraq; see c:COM:IRAQ. Though it is legally public domain in the US, WP:Public domain requires that such works be used under WP:NFCC only. Suggest relicense to non-free or delete. Wikiacc ( ¶) 01:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Though this image is used on a Library of Congress website, it is unclear whether it is a US government work. (Also, the image is not used in mainspace.) Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphan image. No evidence of release by copyright holder. ★ Bigr Tex 03:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
The source website shows that as of the date this image was uploaded to Wikipedia, the license was Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share-Alike License 3.0, which is not a compatible license. This is still the license today. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
It's not questionable if it's clearly incompatible. Delete it anyway because it is orphaned(but I like this map, so I am downloading it onto my computer anyway lol). — WinnerWolf99 talk What did I break now? 17:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)*Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 10:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)