The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Map by the State of Wisconsin, incorrectly tagged as federal government works. Since the map was made in 1955, and doesn't appear to carry a copyright notice, maybe {{ PD-US-no notice}} could apply? Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use by Wikiacc - FASTILY 06:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a 1930 US-made film, whose attribution to the US government seems confused (the US Library of Congress may hold a print but it certainly didn't make the film). Perhaps there is a valid reason for public domain (no copyright notice, copyright not renewed, etc.) but until we have evidence for that, I suggest delete or relicense as non-free. Wikiacc ( ¶) 04:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Scan of a newspaper or magazine photo. Claim of being the copyright holder is not credible. Whpq ( talk) 11:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Fair use status is fine, but the concerns raised about the accuracy of the file (possible original research) were not adequately addressed. No prejudice to restoration if someone can provide a citation proving that the file is the official version - FASTILY 06:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
WP:NFCC: Previous publication. Non-free content must be a work which has been published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia by (or with permission from) the copyright holder
No proof this was published by Disney or with their permission. No proof it's official either. Or what year it's from. According to User:Tbhotch, Wikipedia:Verifiability goes right out of the window when it comes to fair use media and they suggested I take this to FFD. I'm disappointed.
Another image is available for the article, but I don't oppose someone uploading a prettier image if it's properly sourced. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 17:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The design is outdated
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
This image is merely used to support the honor Bob Gibson received, rather than to illustrate the work of art itself or to discuss the artistic genre or technique, as claimed using {{ Non-free 3D art}}. Failing WP:NFCC#8. Wcam ( talk) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Map by the State of Wisconsin, incorrectly tagged as federal government works. Since the map was made in 1955, and doesn't appear to carry a copyright notice, maybe {{ PD-US-no notice}} could apply? Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use by Wikiacc - FASTILY 06:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a 1930 US-made film, whose attribution to the US government seems confused (the US Library of Congress may hold a print but it certainly didn't make the film). Perhaps there is a valid reason for public domain (no copyright notice, copyright not renewed, etc.) but until we have evidence for that, I suggest delete or relicense as non-free. Wikiacc ( ¶) 04:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Scan of a newspaper or magazine photo. Claim of being the copyright holder is not credible. Whpq ( talk) 11:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Fair use status is fine, but the concerns raised about the accuracy of the file (possible original research) were not adequately addressed. No prejudice to restoration if someone can provide a citation proving that the file is the official version - FASTILY 06:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
WP:NFCC: Previous publication. Non-free content must be a work which has been published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia by (or with permission from) the copyright holder
No proof this was published by Disney or with their permission. No proof it's official either. Or what year it's from. According to User:Tbhotch, Wikipedia:Verifiability goes right out of the window when it comes to fair use media and they suggested I take this to FFD. I'm disappointed.
Another image is available for the article, but I don't oppose someone uploading a prettier image if it's properly sourced. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 17:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The design is outdated
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
This image is merely used to support the honor Bob Gibson received, rather than to illustrate the work of art itself or to discuss the artistic genre or technique, as claimed using {{ Non-free 3D art}}. Failing WP:NFCC#8. Wcam ( talk) 19:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)